The rank dishonesty of Mad Cow Maddow

… and most Democrats, labour, RINOs, CINOs, Remoaners.

I was unfortunate enough to see a Bill Whittle episode on Mad Cow and thought she couldn’t be as bad as he made out.

She was. She was worse.  It was about the Reno air show and there was a crash of an ageing plane, some people were hurt.  Mad Cow went on MSNBC and called for all air shows to be banned – that’s the sort of thing the left does.

MSNBC’s ratings dipped drastically in recent months but there are still poor sods watching that creature. You’ve never known me have a real go at lesbians before but I shall in her case – she has dyke written all over her, with the hysterical emotion-riddled excuse for journalism she goes on about.

Now, these kids at the border.  The one they were running, the mother, has been done for smuggling, she deliberately put her kid in harm’s way and then cried to the Democrats – they know they can.

As just about anyone sane said to these disingenuous people – if you don’t cross the border illegally, then there are no separations.  As it was, these were holdovers from the Obama era – the only caged children were done by Obama, just like the Fast and Furious killings  – yep, he really loved Mexicans, did Barry the Kenyan.

See, it’s all so false.  Now either Mad Cow is well aware of all this, in which case she is criminally manipulating stupid Democrat voters or else she really believes her rubbish without even bothering to read the sane press, which lays it out clearly.

In which case, she’s a terrible journo and she only reinforces all the things I’ve written this week about certain types of women.

This crying thing was nauseating.

As for Fonda:

These are the sorts of people Democrats are. Our equivalents are Soubry, Grieves and the House of Lords.


# I told you I was sick
# I was hoping for a pyramid
# Ma loves Pa, Pa loves wimmin, Ma caught Pa with two in swimmin, here lies Pa

Seriously though, you need to strike the right note – not too flippant, such as:

# You’re standing on my boobs

… or too serious and tome like. My own might be:

# He went too far


The net is closing in

Ho ho ho, it’s hotting up:

Fired FBI Director James B. Comey refused to appear before Congress on Monday to talk about his handling of the Clinton email investigation, and his fired deputy, Andrew McCabe, asserted his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination, Sen. Charles E. Grassley said.

Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch also declined to show up for a major hearing where the Senate Judiciary Committee was looking into the inspector general’s report detailing major bungles in Mr. Comey’s handling of the Clinton investigation.

Mr. Comey’s lawyer said he was out of the country — though Mr. Grassley, committee chairman, said he saw Mr. Comey was in Iowa over the weekend, visiting a key state in presidential campaigning.

I notice that Strzok has been subpoenaed.

Behind bars for you lot, Clinton’s hearing footsteps. 🙂

If we’re treading on thin ice, we may as well dance …

Not a reference to ice but to Royal Ascot.  I’m going to pull no punches about these damsels below.  The pics are by various sources at the Wail – by the time I composed this post and went to the Wail for the url, it had gone and become something about Sparkle.

Now, the theme of this post is what is nice and why, what is awful and why.

Nice and why

1. Age truly doesn’t come into it for me – if she holds and conducts herself as a lady, that will do me, thanks:

2. Possibly the nicest there:

3. This one would be the benchmark for most people – young, elegant, nice deportment and smile.  Hair up is a big factor with me:

4. There could be few objections – the outfit, the deportment, the smile, the modesty – another benchmark:

Nice and awful

5. Lady on our left – feminine in her body language, no man woul move like that – she’s OK.  The one on our right – aagghh!!  When I were a lad, I was taught to stand upright, head back, stomach in, smile and speak when spoken to. That’s for a boy, mind, for a man, not for a blinkin’ woman – who needs a sergeant-major woman?

The whole body language of that female in white is wrong – women don’t stand like men, also look at the cynical, me-me-me facial expression – avarice all over it, harsh voice I’d wager, aggressive, look at that clenched fist:

Awful and why

6. It’s not so much the fatness, the porcine aspect of these three.  With the one in the middle – it’s the tattoo straight away – ladies don’t do that.  It’s mainly the aggressive way of walking.  With the one on our right, it’s her masculine manner, at the same time letting her mammaries flop out – the whole body language is bad, so harsh and aggressive and the lovely dress does not hide it:

7. First look at this one below and you’d be forgiven for thinking she’s on the wrong list – clearly a prettily shaped face, hair up, nice outfit, navy is one of my colours but then I looked closely and realized she was not nice at all – pretty, yes but knows it full well and as hard as nails. The instant a woman acts as if she’s full of her own beauty, she ceases being beautiful and that’s me gone.

Then came the photo on our right and just look at that hands-on-hips business – you couldn’t get less feminine than that.  This is a classic case of if she was in eastern Europe, she’d look wonderful.  Here she looks westernised, self-entitled and horrible:

8. I really do strongly object to kids being sexualised, so look at the kid on our right with her open cleavage.  You don’t do that to kids in public!

9. The Muslim effect -really goes well at a race meet, doesn’t it?