Part 4: Wheels within wheels within wheels

Part 1: Letter from New Zealand
Part 2: The world is in good hands
Part 3: Sovereignty – who actually owns this nation
Part 4: Wheels within wheels
Part 5: The Venetians and the concept of oligarchy
Part 6: The assault on science and the great climate scam
Part 7: Atonalism and the assault on society
Part 8: Understanding is half the battle
Part 9: The resistance
Part 10: Who rules the world – further reading

Eventually, if one goes down this path of exploring wheels within wheels – the BofE in the BIS, the BIS connection with the City of London, the City’s connection with the U.S.A. and how the old families somehow crop up in all of it – one reaches a line in the sand.

To stop at that point is wise, readers might accept it to that point and even see some logic in it.  For example, if you start from the premise that anything of value you have or you’ve built up you see as yours and would like it to remain as yours, then inevitably you would like it passed down to the next generation – that’s inheritance.  If you’ve cornered the market in newspapers or in banking or whatever, you’re not going to let it go lightly.


Eventually you’re going to connect with likeminded people dedicated to maintaining the status quo and in fact, reinforcing it.  Old families like the McDonalds, St Clairs and Stuarts [Stewarts] have been written about by many.  Other families such as the Coutts and the Sandonhalls are also worth exploring to see how they’ve survived as banking houses and how they’ve merged and extended their influence.

These last are a connection between the BIS, the Corporation of London, Coutts and the Scots aristocracy, all in one.  They are not an isolated case.  When those families breed in a narrow manner, e.g. the Rothschild rule that one only marries as widely as a second cousin, then it’s pretty clear that a dynasty is founded and that word which represents the line in the sand – bloodline – then comes into it.

They’re all into it.

In “The Illustrious Lineage of the Royal House Of Britain” (First Published in 1902 by The Covenant Publishing Co., Ltd., London, England), the authors easily trace Prince Charles’ lineage back to David and beyond.  The College of Heralds (London) has also traced Prince Charles to be the 145th direct descendant of King David. This claim was also made, in May of 2000, in a documentary on Israeli television.

Charles also claims descent from Islam’s prophet Mohammed.  Prince Charles has a red dragon on his coat of arms from the flag of Wales. At his coronation (investiture as Prince of Wales) in 1969, he sat on a chair with a large red dragon emblazoned on it.

During the ceremony, his mother, Queen Elizabeth II said:

“This dragon gives you your power, your throne and your own authority.”

His response to her was:

“I am now your Liege-man, and worthy of your earthly worship.”

At a minimum, these things can be seen as symbolic representations of the esoteric but another way to look at it is that it all seems a bit weird.

I was looking at a googletube of Coleman speaking on how Washington is destabilizing America and most of it was pretty orthodox until it came to funding.  Now names came out like Oltramaire, Agnelli, Peccei, Pierpaolo Luzzatti Fequiz and so on and somehow, these names were linked with the Queen.  I knew she’d married a Greek but wasn’t aware of any Venetian connection.

Then Coleman came out with: “Interestingly enough, the Queen of England is a Guelph. She is not a Windsor. This is a title evolved in 1935 by her father.” Leaving aside his non-mention of the Saxe-Coburg question and the nice mention of England, he went on to say that following financial crises,  [this youtube was made during Clinton’s time], the Britannia anchors off Venice and they all pile on board to have a Black Nobility meeting.

That was a bit hard to swallow and so I did some research. First up was Wikianswers:

The Queen’s surname, if it were to be used, is indeed Windsor. However, there is no surname on the Queen’s Marriage certificate for either her or Prince Phillip. He is listed simply as Phillip RN. The original Royal Proclamation dated 17th July 1917 changing the royal surname to Windsor and creating the House of Windsor, indeed did have a surname within the text as well as the House name of Sax-Coburg.

The surname was Guelph – they did not use the German version of the name which was Die Welfin meaning “the Wolf”. Guelph is the oldest dynasty in Europe being some 800 years old and still survives to this day. The Queen’s forebears acquired this name through George 1 who was of the House of Hanover and later via Queen Victoria and Edward VII.

It should be noted that, if looking up the Proclamation on the internet, the version that is published on the internet is the version released in December 1958 and it does not have the name Guelph within the text. However, the original version did have the surname . It was Guelph.

You could have knocked me down with a feather. Next up was an ad for a Kijiji Guelph mug and guess whose face smiles out from it?

Next was the Guelph Pipe Band and the city itself:

The town was named to honour Britain’s royal family, the Hanoverians, who were descended from the Guelfs, the ancestral family of George IV, the reigning British monarch; thus the nickname The Royal City.

The connection between Welf and Guelph was interesting.

Just why they would wish for the name Guelph not to be known ?

Today the Guelphs rule by dominating the raw materials market, and for years they have fixed the price of gold, also controlling the price of copper, zinc, lead and tin. Companies include British Petroleum, Oppenheimer, Lonrho, Philbro and others.

Hmmmmm. I’ve just come across someone called Daniel Estulin who writes:

It is essentially a private criminal enterprise which stretches across the globe, operating through a network of government agencies, private institutions and both publically owned and private corporations and financial institutions. Now this extended network, which is called the fondi, stretches all the way back to the Middle Ages.

Again the fondi is the combined wealth of these oligarchical families. It is concentrated in your tangible things: land, oil, raw materials, precious minerals and metals. And by controlling the financial trade of these items, these family fathers set up fondis that are pooled together for maximum effect and deployed through a number of financial institutions, which hide their origins from the unsuspecting public.

At the heart of the fondi system, you have the powerful merchant private banks …

… and so on.

[Many thanks, Ian Parker-Joseph]

18 comments for “Part 4: Wheels within wheels within wheels

  1. January 9, 2010 at 19:02

    Fascinating stuff.

  2. Rossa
    January 9, 2010 at 20:41

    Suggest you have a look at this:-

    and see who comes up time and time again and who is linked to whom.

    Also if you can get a copy of the late Michael Crichton’s State of Fear you may learn other things. His book is what started it for me about 5-6 years ago. It may be a work of faction (fact and fiction) but he was a lot nearer the truth than I knew or even believed at the time, until I read up on his research for the book. Now it is more relevant than ever.

    The more people who open their eyes to what is really going on without the usual sniping about conspiracies the better. No smoke without fire!

  3. Rossa
    January 9, 2010 at 20:42

    Soory, forgot to say thank you for your posts.

  4. Rossa
    January 9, 2010 at 20:42

    And one day I’ll learn to spell…

  5. January 9, 2010 at 21:12

    Cheers. Talk about a rogue’s gallery at the end of that link.

  6. January 10, 2010 at 16:07

    Nice one James!

    I am still going for the little man with pigeons at the end of the trail 🙂

  7. January 11, 2010 at 14:06

    This is eye-opening stuff – you have me hooked! – off to part 4

    Thanks James

  8. January 11, 2010 at 15:53


  9. swaami
    January 11, 2010 at 17:58

    It’s interesting that your article lead you down the path of what many now condemn as ‘conspiracy theory’. I’ve no interest in sovriegnty, the EU or any form of politics precisely because the power structure you have scratched the surface of is the ONLY source of power on this planet. Democary (not a mispell), monarchs, polititians are all part of the illusion – a grand sideshow con for the sheeple. In the kindest and most compassionate way I say to you – WAKE UP! Your Albion site and many carefuly thought out critiques on society/politics are well intentioned. If you have any desire for true democracy devote your blog to continuing exposure of the sick, unfeeling scum that many call the NWO – believe me you have only seen the tip of the iceberg.

  10. January 11, 2010 at 21:38

    You might have something there, Swaami but it’s no theory.

  11. swaami
    January 11, 2010 at 22:09

    It is interesting and almost morbidly fascinating to read about some the the royals’ behaviour. They perform the weirdest ceremonies at astrologically significant times in appointed locations and with many masonic connotations. Old Charlie has been tutored by the highest Sufi mystics – the ancient root of Islam. There is an awful lot of authoratative writing about it. It does worry me though that the fascination in the details of it can distract from the horrific slaughter and bloodletting, misery, poverty and mind control that they wreak on 95% of humanity – wars and starvation, propaganda and brainwashing are like a walk in the park to them. This is no hyperbole or cranky theory. Unfortunately there are too many nuts that have stigmatised this subject, which deserves more scholarly attention.

  12. swaami
    January 11, 2010 at 22:26

    Having had a read through some other threads on this this blog I think this would be a great place to expose some of the other aspects behind ‘Who owns this country’ (Rothschilds et al IMO). You seem to have many intelligent and articulate commentors here, some who were surprised by your discoveries. I hope you will turn your attention to producing another excellent documentation of the corruption and expand on the ramifications of your discoveries. IMO It would be the best furtherment you could give to the cause of Albion (and humanity).

  13. January 12, 2010 at 00:42

    There are some things people are still not ready for. I often stop short of saying them.

Comments are closed.