The SPPNA revisited

CFRMembersInOvalOffice

CFR members in the oval office

Those who know nothing of the SPPNA might look, first of all, at the pdf put out by the CFR, the insidious organization behind all bar a few presidents of the U.S.A. and extending into all aspects of American public and private life.  The roll call of past and present members is like a who’s who of the U.S.A.

You could go to the official site of the Council on Foreign Relations and try to get an idea from there or you can get a completely different picture by delving, for example, into the 50th anniversary issue of “Foreign Affairs,” the official publication of the CFR, in an article by Kingman Brewster, Jr. entitled “Reflections on Our National Purpose.” Our purpose should be, according to him, to do away with our nationality, to “take some risks in order to invite others to pool their sovereignty with ours…”.

This is a fair summation of what members are about and this names but doesn’t give definitive proof of certain members who might interest you.

If you scan that pdf, you’ll see proposals for a North American Advisory Council to “oversee” and “advise” on policy in the U.S.A, Canada and Mexico by 2010, in the areas of:

# single economic zone,
# single area of free movements of people,
# single education system,
# single defense and security system,
# single social benefits system

Big deal, you might say – there are so many thinktanks out there, all of whom produce papers to direct to the government.  The difference here is that the CFR is no ordinary organization, which came out in the meeting at Baylo University, Waco, on March 23rd, 2005 where Bush, Martin and Fox, of the three nations, met to discuss the proposals, the result being the SPPNA which has now dropped the NA and added Gov, giving it U.S. govt backing.

The issue blew up in 2006 and even reached mainstream America by 2008, the proposal causing the most anger being the new Amero unit of currency to eventually replace the dollar once society broke down.  That breakdown is another issue at another time.

So when BobG writes:

The law should be more clear and specific. That said, I don’t see a problem with the intent of the law; to curb the flood of illegals coming in. Basically the law says the same thing that the federal law says.  The only reason it passed is because the federal government refuses to enforce it.

They have the manpower and money to go after harmless gun owners, they have the manpower and money to wage war on marijuana, but they can’t seem to get their shit together when it comes to securing our border.  This has been going on for several years, and the people in the state are tired of the federal government sitting around with their thumbs up their asses while they are getting a deluge of smugglers, thieves, and murderers coming in along with the illegals.

For some time now, the federal government has managed to poke its nose into a lot of areas that are not really their business; the Constitution tells what powers the government has, and it has overreached them badly.

But securing our borders against invasion is one of the things that is specifically spelled out as the responsibility of the federal government, and they have been shirking that duty for decades.

… there is more to it than meets the eye.

Yes Bob and something which throws light on why is the material on the SPPNA above.  The CFR [and therefore the American] aim has been, for a long time, proposed via contributors to the journal.  Now you can argue the case that editorial control is so weak at the CFR that the views expressed by contributors do not reflect those of the editors and yet the same views come through regularly.  For example, in the December 15, 1922 edition, Philip Kerr stated:

“Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind as long as the earth remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states, until some kind of international system is created. The real problem today is that of world government.”

On October 28, 1939, John Foster Dulles addressing a YMCA conference, stated that America lead the transition to:

“a new order of less independent, semi-sovereign states bound together by a league or federal union.”

Dulles was to go on to become U.S. Secretary of State and he was a founding member of the CFR, one of their revered fathers.  It continues down through the life of the CFR and of the nation, for example, in July 1948, Sir Harold Butler wrote an article that appeared in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs publication entitled, “A New World Takes Shape:

“How far can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of themselves as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic or political union?”

This was interesting, not only for what it said but for the fact that the CFR obviously crosses the pond and its contributors are everywhere, an example being, say, Minette Marin of the Sunday Times but that’s digressing.

The central point is that this is the world view of the movers and shakers in our society and though the CFR is American and the name changes on this side of the Atlantic, the message is much the same.  It can be formalized or left unformalized – in this case, it is formalized: The European Council on Foreign Relations.  The names hardly matter.

On and on and on.  On Nov. 25, 1959, the Council on Foreign Relations Study Number 7 called for a:

“…new international order which must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, for social and economic change…an international order…including states labeling themselves as ‘socialist’

Yada, yada.

This is why you hear from Obama, Brown, Cameron, Clegg, the EU commissioners, the treasonous Ashton and so on, all speaking of freedom and fairness for all, fuzzy Labour and Lib Dem supporters lap it up because it sounds … well … so good, doesn’t it but the reality is what they have stated elsewhere.  I used the term “treasonous” for Ashton but in the end, it comes down to: “Treasonous to what?  Treasonous to whom?”

The answer, in Ashton’s case, is “treasonous to the UK and England, loyal to a fault to a superstate”.  That defines the battle lines.  In Clegg’s and Brown’s case, they are openly treasonous to the UK and England by virtue of their superstate credentials and in a twisted way, less contemptible.

The real viper though is Cameron who’s clearly hoodwinked the Tory MPs and now, predictably, having disciplined them to get him into power, has turned on the very 1922 committee who swept him into power with his superstate chums.

I don’t know how much more clearly it can be spelled out – he is a snake in the grass, a treasonous despot who will use anyone and any party to gain and use power to stop the most important moves necessary in the broken society which he rabbits on about.  He’ll lie in bed with any other politician of any persuasion and even had some of us fooled the other day with his Bill and Ben garden speech.

Cameron, ladies and gentlemen, is far more of a problem than Obama because he is pretending to be someone else.  Take the mask off and guess who’s behind it?

15 comments for “The SPPNA revisited

  1. May 20, 2010 at 15:07

    “The tyranny of a prince in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as is the apathy of the citizens in a democracy.” Charles de Montesquieu

  2. May 20, 2010 at 15:28
  3. May 20, 2010 at 16:24

    Major capital flight leaving London for Switzerland.

    German finance minister say needs rules for orderly insolvency of euro denominated states…… Does this mean german exit, probaly not…probably means EU contracts…minus PIIGS.

    F***ing hell!

  4. May 21, 2010 at 08:07

    You’re right – a time to speak out but look at the interest this article didn’t attract. The highest hits at the moment are on the “heights of actors” post. Almost no one came in on the SPPNA post although some exited after it.

    The issue is simply not attracting anyone, even bloggers I visit who were formerly into this issue. We’re sleepwalking into oblivion.

  5. May 21, 2010 at 09:03

    Yes, sleepwalking.

    No interest….

    It’s why I mostly just post links.

    Here is a worrying development in Auz….again, a socialist govt…..actively trying to kill the golden goose with a mining supertax. There is a balance to strike by profitable miners giving back an equitable amount. What the gov’t proposes, on top of what mining already contributes is more than equitable. The fuckers never seem to learn.

    This is also worrying. Illegal act by Auz gov’t…… reputation internationally is becoming quite soiled.

    http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/05/19/wikileaks/index.html

  6. May 21, 2010 at 09:19

    Note, the presentation is by the author of “The creature from Jekyll island”.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLsi0Ialvxk

  7. May 21, 2010 at 09:19

    Labor government in Australia – they’re having their Nu-Labor years now, whereas we’ve just come out of ours and are moving on to the next horror.

  8. May 21, 2010 at 09:39

    Is this the one?

    Stock up on autofuel and food. J*sus Christ the world is barking mad…like there aren’t enough problems without these stupid c*nts making it worse.

    The US and UK are already global pariahs with their constant warmongering and international bullying…add in the blatant financial frauds recently revealed….this could ignite the entire ME, with counter attacks against the house of Saud.

    http://www.debka.com/article/8794/

    Here is an article with some useful stats that you may be able to use.

    http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article16560.html#comment90781

  9. May 21, 2010 at 10:39

    Here is how to do it.

    Just requires balls

    http://www.waynedaniel.net/images/Document1.pdf

  10. May 21, 2010 at 10:47

    I’ve just looked at Yuri Bezmenov and had seen fragments before but not the whole interview. It is quite vital this gets out and I’m thinking how to do it. To present all 9 vids will have the effect the SPPNA post did – turn people off.

    I have a friend who says the moment he sees the words Common Purpose, he clicks out. Interesting, eh? This is the major problem – just to get people to take the cloth out of their ears and the blinkers off their eyes.

    But there’s a third problem. Bezmenov is not a nice person necessarily – it’s just that what he says is true. These people, as we are, get bitter that no one listens and we start using words like “idiots” and no one wants to be called an idiot, especially if he has a vested interest in not admitting he’s been duped.

    So people don’t like people such as Xxxl and Higham. They tend to move away from their blogs and so on. It’s a very great problem in disseminating the facts. Even when the events confirm what we’ve been going on about, e.g. Cameron and the way he is acting now, which we predicted three years ago – people will do anything but acknowledge that we were saying that. They themselves want to be the discoverers of new truths.

    Now it matters not who gets it out to the people at all but that it gets out. It matters not that we will be some of the first rounded up. What matters is that if people were to listen now, then some defences could be made in our heads.

    As Bezmenov said, it takes a whole generation or even two to brainwash a nation and get your people in place. So we are not going to have success showing people how the wolves are among us because they will not listen. As Bezmenov said, he was accused of watching too many James Bond movies.

    The greatest task is not to get the information – because it is there for all to see even now – but how to get our people to at least LOOK at it – that’s all. Then, if they decide it is not the truth, not the case, we’ve done all we can do.

    But as it stands now, we are at the door, knocking – we have the briefcase of dossiers ready to show but no one will open the door and invite us in.

  11. May 21, 2010 at 13:02

    James, did you catch all my comments here

    http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/index.php/2010/05/07/on-the-other-side/#comments

    Maybe you do understand…

    A long time ago I explained the affect that the efficient conversion and use of hydrocarbons in energy generation had had on widget production, and GDP over the last century. For the last few decades that has been pissed away by certain nations, deliberately creating inefficient uses of hydrocarbons. To some extent debt has taken its place, borrowed from our future selves, repayment probably falling at a future time when the GDP enhancement from increasingly expensive hydrocarbons is inevitably fading/failing……………..

    No one is considering that in their projections….

    Sigh!

  12. May 22, 2010 at 20:03

    I wasn’t drawing your attention to that comment.

    I give up.

    I don’t score points!

    It seems almost to be a consistent, deliberate , misunderstanding.

    When a simple picture of a weighty thighed woman on a bicycle can extract so many comments in such a short space of time, compared to comments, for example, on this subject, which affects everyone globally…..When in general, subjects relating to ongoing wars,..some of them actual projectile wars,…or financial terrorism, by Wall Street, the IMF, the ECB, to the detriment of the entire western world at the very least, absent perhaps my comments, and yours, James, …attract pretty much zero comments…well, I am lost for an explanation,…. except for a comment that the perps have won the war, ..

    What to do, I don’t know.

    Clearly the current folks don’t think this is the forum for such subjects.

    James…you have gone the “political route”, but that is not where the victory, or otherwise, will happen.

    The result will be created in the financial world…..at the time of 11hours, 59 minutes, 59 seconds, when the planet cries out…

    A step towards the result was created when the ECB “bailout” of banks, bond-holders, CDS holders, etc, was enacted, transfering the debt to the taxpayers shoulders. Voices were raised in outcry at that point…the previously unthinkable was enacted.

    As a counter attack, naked shorting was banned a few days later, although the announced limitations can be avoided by going via other exchanges, or shorting the Euro directly. Europe may be pissed by Wall Street bullying, but they are not in the clear yet, and I’m not sure Merkel, et al really know what is going on yet. Certainly other nations should now follow. China did this long ago concerning derivatives.

    THIS is the battle that will determine the future.

    Ultimately, the debts cannot be paid..austerity lessens GDP. Just look at the ex Russian Baltic States. What cannot be paid, will not be paid… even if it takes civil war to say NO,… the alternative being massive capital flight, (witnessed last week in Europe) which creates more problems.

    There is a way out for the UK, if Camoron can find it,…I doubt it… but it would only be parochial, limited to his jurisdiction, and the international turmoil would limit the result.

    But this is not the forum. No-one gives a shit. Quizz shows, singing contests, cory, semi neckid wimin, etc.

    The perps have won….Bollox to ’em.

  13. May 23, 2010 at 00:18

    Just replying in general to the post and the comments.

    There are more people out there who are aware than you think. They may not know all the finer details that have been posted here, but they certainly do know what is going on. And they have an idea of what is coming next!

    I understand why xxxl says this is not the forum for getting through to people. It can be done, but it has to be subtle. My personal approach to getting people to at least see what I am thinking is to plant a seed for them to come back to later. They don’t have to agree with me, but a seed of thought is planted (for consideration) and more often than not they come back to me with it later one way or another.

    As you know I have been in a political forum over the past week and the most intelligent/enlightened know what is going on and have done for some time!

    The question is – how do we make that change…

  14. May 23, 2010 at 01:01

    Xxxl – I did indeed look at all your comments. Cherie – yes, I think comments is not necessarily an indicator. The SPPNA post had many more late readers – it didn’t take off immediately.

    Xxxl – the financial area is where it will be lost or won – yes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.