The Talking Clock has run a poll, as you can see, below:
The latest voice, Michael Howard, is just one of so many who are calling for an inquiry – there were the eight experts last week, of course:
However in a letter to the Times last week, the eight experts insisted the conclusion was unsafe. They argued that a severed ulnar artery, the wound found to Kelly’s wrist, was unlikely to be life-threatening unless an individual had a blood clotting deficiency.
… and there have been countless people before that. The 70 year lock-up of information on it fools whom?
So many have posted on David Kelly and despite the Mai Pedersen evidence being hardly conclusive, it all adds to the unrest and the only way to scotch that unrest is to hold an independent inquiry which the people would be satisfied was independent. Before people tired of the Di murder, the inquiries left people dissatisfied and thus the Pink Coalition needs to make it above board in this case, confidence in the honesty of the Coalition being in quite short supply at this time.
If this is not done, then it is clear that all sides in the House are equally culpable and manifestly dishonest, the result being that the people of this land then have a lawful duty to remove such obstructive politicians and start over.
Everyone knows, of course, that if the Kelly inquiry is reopened, then that brings Blair to the dock and that then begins spin-off litigation against him, class actions on so many other issues – for example, why he lied to MPs – and that then brings others in and the whole house of cards is in danger of collapsing.
This would not be so good for Them until the new structure was in place and so they must resist present calls for an inquiry, to save their own skins or else pay them lip service, just as we must press them forward – say, by an enormous petition to Downing Street?