This above is the way it should be. It is not a construct, it is not one from many equal choices – it is the way biology arranged it for our species.
This, at the end of this link is utter sickness.
Now when is someone going to stop running scared of the gay mafia and call a spade a spade? To mix metaphors even further, when is anyone going to quote the “emperor’s new clothes” as an analogy and tell it as it is?
Of all the issues – the EU, Cable, Obama, the snow, the flight of the dollar, the liars in Westminster, the spin-doctors, China, Muslim terrorists, the general PC madness at large – none is sicker than this one.
Those two did not, under any conceivable circumstances, “have a child”. They took someone else’s child, for even in the world of false constructs there is still one which can not be imposed on nature – and that is that it takes a male and a female to have a child. So, for their own “happiness” and for their own self-fulfilment, to compensate for biologically not being able to have children, they decide to ruin a child’s life.
And look at the complicit in this – from the Telegraph itself which announced that they’d had a child to those in the community speaking in support of this travesty – there is a furrowed brow, as they briefly consider the voice of reality and they move on as if nothing had ever happened.
When will anyone speak up for the children, apart from the multitude out there claiming to speak for the children, in order to push through their agendas?
Or are we already too far gone?
When will someone, anyone, in a position of power, come out and say that a child is the product of parents, ideally married? One person and a Marxist at that – Julia Gillard! With her toyboy in the Lodge with her and her relativistic Marxist roots, one doesn’t hold out much hope that she won’t make a u-turn at the conference.
Just because I have many gay friends does not make them right on this. Why are they right – because they’re gay? If you choose a homosexual union, then fine – you wear the consequences, which are that it is just you two and you two only, to the end of your days or until the end of your union, whichever comes first [yes I know the end of life is the end of the union too].
It has zero to do with procreation and zero to do with marriage, which is all about the purpose of procreation, whether or not a married couple decide on or can have children or not.
The assault on children has gone on long enough – in the schools who only now employ potential abusers who allow sex and drugs and even encourage it, whilst failing to educate the child in literacy and numeracy, in the homes where parents are strangely complacent and almost zombie-like in lack of protection towards their children and in the high-profile horses’ backsides, like these two bozos in the front page Telegraph article.
No one important seems to be supporting the fundamental right of a child, which is to have a mother and a father, living in relative peace and bringing him/her up with a decent set of values.