Who are all these people? What are they protesting against?
It’s about Jill Meagher, a young woman who was horribly raped and murdered. Why would 30 000 people turn out to march about Jill in particular? Reminds me a bit of the 300 000 Belgians who marched on Brussels over the aristocratic child rapes and murders.
whose body was found north of Melbourne a week after she disappeared while out with workmates at a Brunswick bar. A 41-year-old man faces charges of rape and murder
If she was out with mates, how could she have been raped and murdered? Ah, just found out that she was alone in transit – an insane thing for a woman to do, especially these days, as noted further down.
Women have always been a problem for themselves. Look at men and women, boys and girls. Now, before the days when the uncaring new Casey Anthony type parent and the PC teacher, plus the global culture left children woefully exposed, children were relatively safe.
There was a thing called common sense which prevailed.
Kids had curfews, there was a generally agreed procedure that you didn’t go off to France with someone else’s kid and women didn’t generally try to outdo men by getting into paedophilia. It wasn’t great but it wasn’t a disaster. Comparatively, it was a utopia. Kids would grumble about the boundaries but knew where the boundaries were. The wise parent gradually allowed more and more freedom for the offspring. In other words, parents cared.
So there really was no issue with kids – everyone knew what had to be done to protect kids. The problem was women. They are, at the same time, both grown up and also very vulnerable. A father can tell a kid: “No, you’ll be home at 10,” but he can’t tell his woman that. He never used to have to – she was an adult alongside him, she knew, they both knew. She knew there were places not to venture, situations which she wouldn’t enter unless she had physical support and so on.
Not now. What we’ve got today is the insanity and infantilization of the global socialist culture, through feminazis and really nasty people like the Marxist who’s just died – what was his name? Through the Saul Alinskys etc. Woman is now, at exactly the same time, less capable, more vulnerable and yet she feels she is Helen Reddy – invincible, can do anything, can have anything, the glorious dawn of a new era for women.
Except it’s not glorious. It’s an abject failure. Domestic violence has soared, women are not doing it well and they keep getting raped and/or killed. There are certain things they simply haven’t taken onboard.
1. There are so many men layabouts now and a new type of male on the streets and in pubs and clubs – a beast inside. Where he used to sink a few pints after work with mates, then go home to the wife, now he collects benefits, sits around watching porn or else goes out looking for trouble.
Men should all be out at work and they’re not. Why not? Ask whoever invented “positive discrimination”, the welfare culture, the masculation of women and the emasculation of men into SNAGs and Metros, ask the misandrist CPA and everyone else devoted to removing men as a factor in society.
And men have gone one of three ways – either 1. they’re the age I am and don’t let women get uppity but at the same time respects her more deeply than today’s equality lip service givers or 2. they become emasculated, especially the new young men who’ve had a barrage of subtle abuse from females in the home or at school or 3. they become the new yahoos, bestialized brutes in men’s skins.
The new man sees the attitude of women to him, how women carp on and on about respect and being able to do it all, being the winners of the Olympics for GB and so on and he sees that women don’t give a toss about anyone but themselves. So whither respect, whither chivalry? The yahoo takes the things that have characterized men through the ages and exaggerates them into a grotesque parody.
This is the type of yahoo 30 000 people marched in the streets against. For what? I saw the protest and took it on board. If you’re reading this, you might have too. We all agree the violence is shocking but women are addressing the wrong people – they need to address the yahoos about these things.
And do they honestly believe the yahoos are listening?
2. There is this Lara Logan syndrome – believing that she is living in some sort of cocoon where men who feel they’ve been f***ed over, who are going to do a woman violence as sure as night follows day – she believes she is immune from harm, that somehow they’ll put all that aside when they see her and suddenly be all chivalrous. Her sisters have killed off chivalry in men but she thinks they’ll be chivalrous with her … because it’s her.
Lara Logan was well off, with the lovely home, everyone worshipped her beauty, she was fully infused with the American females idea that not only can she mix it with the men [e.g. Marissa] but she can dominate. It’s a highly politicized chip on the shoulder. With this attitude, she marched over to a bunch of Arabs in the middle of an angry protest – how insane was that [?] – and proceeded to get groped and/or raped.
Then she was shocked to the core that such a thing could happen. Amazing – this is what feminism has done to women’s brains.
Back home, the new young woman or recycled woman then goes out with the least chivalrous men about on the streets. She’ll go off with a perfect stranger she’s not met before for a one night stand, as an article of her newfound freedom to be a skank, asserting that she is still a woman of virtue and she thinks that somehow, miraculously, she will be automatically safe.
She conflates that she should be safe from harm with actually being safe from harm. All those people on the streets protesting are protesting over what they see should be, what the government, in its draconian misandrist legislation, should have ensured and yet it’s ensured the opposite. She is dismayed that it hasn’t gone the way she’d hoped and in fact could never ever have gone any other way.
She becomes more manlike with every passing year, she becomes unreasonable in her attitude and impossible to speak with. At the bar, whilst trying to mix it with the men as one of the men, she expects them to behave with perfect civility and chivalry .
Meanwhile, the yahoo observes her and waits. He equates her with the porn he watches ad nauseam.
3. The government, by its draconian measures to change the very nature of work in the land, its support for the misandrist CPA and for any measure which will put men down has angered many.
The unsustainable PC narrative clung to so vehemently by devotees is an abject failure and far from empowering anyone, it has both disempowered them in real terms, plus created a new monster to prey on them. The people I feel sorriest for are not the new women who think they can go anywhere, do anything with impunity – though what happens to them is unfortunate.
The ones I feel sorry for are those ladies of the old school, the ones brought up properly to be feminine and who expect men to act as gentlemen in return, women such as those I meet at work. In the eyes of the yahoos, these ladies are lumped under the same heading and are, in their eyes, rapable flotsam, just as much as the tattooed, gum-chewing, foul-mouthed monstrosities you see all over the place today [see Daily Femail column for examples].
Let’s take my bosses for an example of the other type – a proper woman. They would never take the takings to the bank alone – they’d always go with someone and yes, preferably a man. Now, they don’t carry on about what women can and can’t do – they know the limits.
Men know limits. On a scale from Mike Tyson and Popeye the Sailor Man to the limp-wristed wimp, there is a sliding scale of people able to protect themselves and those who can’t. Down one end of the scale are children and then the bulk of women and then when you get into the men who can look after themselves, there are still a few women in the mix. Finally you get the freakish women weightlifters etc. up with the alpha males and then you get to the Tysons, George Foremans etc. above that.
I’d probably be about two thirds of the way up. Russia tended to have pretty solid men and so there were maybe a good third I wouldn’t have been able to handle, maybe even more. That’s why one trained in the gym – there was no choice, you had to be strong. Women, on the other hand, went to the gym to be toned and svelte. In Russia, a woman expects the man to protect her in the traditional sense and has no hang-ups about that.
It’s only here in the west that so many women have taken leave of their senses.
And looking at domestic violence – why does it happen? If he’s so bad, why does she go with him or marry him? If she knows he’s a beast, odds are he’ll beat her. So she says she didn’t know when she committed to him. Well 1. why didn’t she and 2. if he was nice but subsequently turned into a ravening monster, why did he? I mean, men aren’t werewolves. They don’t suddenly come out at night and change. Something happened in that relationship for the worse. What was it?
Everyone reading this knows the answer to that.
Jill Meagher took a route she’s taken before, assuming she was safe on her own. She wasn’t.. She wasn’t safe because of all the things mentioned above, things I’d wager she never once gave thought to in that walk to and from her works party.
That’s the real tragedy. That and the utter pointlessness of all those women marching when what is really needed is a fundamental change to the whole paradigm, to get society back on track again.
May Jill Meagher’s soul finally find peace.
I have to close off comments now on this thread because due to my own negligence, I caused it to restart at another thread:
That’s where it currently is. Sorry. Trackbacks still work though.