“Islamophobia” is one small aspect …


n the heels of the deadly jihadist attack in Orlando that killed 49, the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)– with the help of the UC Berkeley Center for Race and Gender– released a national strategy report on fighting Islamophobia in 2016. The report’s definition of Islamophobia is so far-out, so steeped in campus Marxist radicalism and Critical Theory jargon, that it actually overshadows the errors in the rest of the 140-page document.  It must be read to be believed:

Islamophobia is a contrived fear or prejudice fomented by the existing Eurocentric and Orientalist global power structure. It is directed at a perceived or real Muslim threat through the maintenance and extension of existing disparities in economic, political, social, and cultural relations, while rationalizing the necessity to deploy violence as a tool to achieve “civilizational rehab” of the target communities (Muslim or otherwise). Islamophobia reintroduces and reaffirms a global racial structure through which resource distribution disparities are maintained and extended.

We’ve railed against this trend for a long time but have we really come up with a plan to root these people out? Where does one start? With the recruiters one would think.

But first, as with Brexit, there must be sufficient public consciousness about it to back any moves from above. Then it’s a case of actually getting into the “above”. In other words, our own sleepers who, once in, start changing their rhetoric and moves by degrees, in response to some stimuli.

Trouble is, we can’t countenance killing off an MP or at a minimum, using her death for full effect as a propaganda tool – it takes a certain kind of mind to stoop so low. And this is the advantage the hard left have.

It’s a conundrum.

8 comments for ““Islamophobia” is one small aspect …

  1. Harry J
    June 25, 2016 at 13:54

    James, whilst I’ve little doubt there was much more to the Jo Cox murder than is apparent ascribing it to the ‘hard left’ seems wide of the mark. Them yes, of course. Quite possibly through some element of the security services but surely the ‘hard left’ gives the wrong impression.

    • June 25, 2016 at 17:28

      Harry, we can discuss this at our leisure.

  2. June 25, 2016 at 14:37

    The Prince of Lies has been on a refresher course at an American University to come up with such tortured reasoning as that. It may have been just after the sex change when he /she became the Princess of Lies.

  3. barnacle bill
    June 25, 2016 at 15:56

    Whilst we await the release of the Sir John Chilcot’s report into the second Iraq War which included the release of the Dodgy Dossier and the unknown number of deaths it was directly/indirectly involved in causing. We should bear in mind the sacrifice of one MP was a small price to pay for continuing the access to the EU gravy train for the rest of our political elites.
    We have seen from T B-Lair onwards the contempt and distain this political elite have for it’s fellow country folk. Allowing unrestricted immigration into our once fair land was a rubbing our noses into it. Using Muslim immigrant fodder was only a adding of salt into the wounds they were causing to the very soul of our country.
    It would appear that we will be fighting on two fronts to get our country back. On one front we will be dealing with the many tentacles of EU enslavement. Whilst the other front will be against the increasing Islamic threat to our way of life.

  4. james wilson
    June 25, 2016 at 18:43

    And here I have been all my life seeking to maintain and extend my resource distribution disparities like it was a good thing.

Comments are closed.