Part 10: Who rules the world – further reading

Part 1: Letter from New Zealand
Part 2: The world is in good hands
Part 3: Sovereignty – who actually owns this nation
Part 4: Wheels within wheels
Part 5: The Venetians and the concept of oligarchy
Part 6: The assault on science and the great climate scam
Part 7: Atonalism and the assault on society
Part 8: Understanding is half the battle
Part 9: The resistance
Part 10: Who rules the world – further reading

To anyone exploring the question of who rules us, I would suggest that this blog is as good a place as any to start – when taken in conjunction with the comments threads on the various linked posts, plus all those links, that is sufficient to initiate further exploration.

I’d start here:

… taking particular note of the links in comments for later reference. From here, I’d click on:

… and before going further, I’d suggest that contained within there and the other posts within that series, written leading up to the 2010 GE over here, is all we really need to know for now in order to answer the question.
For acknowledgements of all who contributed to this series,please see Part 2 linked above.

These also are worthy of consideration:

What so many of those linked articles [internal and external] lead back to, stretching back to antiquity, is that it is all about:

1. Scam and agreed definitions
2. Who holds the money
3. The legal hold on people [see 1 and 2]

One you could throw in here is John Batman in Australia who famously, if apocryphally [who knows] made a treaty with the natives for trinkets and the like. Similar was done by the British around the world, also the East-India Company rewards investigation if you ask Google the right questions, plus the British in China, Boxer Rebellion etc.

It becomes apparent that the very worst elements in the world reside right here, in particular in London and Scotland, the US being a later invention.

Scam and agreed definitions

Essentially, someone with power was one who realized that that meant:

a. Having the money to pay for armies and weaponry
b. Buying such armies and weaponry
c. Getting to set the definitions and write the history.

Therefore, from that position of strength, the law is asserted and the laws are passed. Everything is a definition decided by someone or group of someones and if they are working to a concerted plan, e.g. the Black Nobility, then they take on the robes of legitimacy and that depends on:

[i] Other people’s willingness to accept a system or oligarchy as legit
[ii] See 1. and a, b, c.

Essentially, powerful people [see the definitions again] move into an area and assert – primacy is a factor here, as is usurping and conquest. Always, however it is done, there is an almighty rush to legitimize in law, in contract which, in the eyes of the power, can never be broken. The devil is in the laws.

Who are these powerful people? See Ephesians 6:12. The nature of the networks varies, we can call them Rothschilds, we can go back and call them Sepharvaim or further back – Khazars. It doesn’t matter what they’re called, they are a perverted set of people who have intergenerationally come down to the present day. Call them the Lost Jews, as against the Saved Jews, call them what you want.

A very sharp division now is between each other exploring these things – I take the Christian view that these perverted, the Mammon worshippers, are only part human through the interbreeding since the year dot [see Nephalim etc.]. Others will say they are just men and women, nothing more, having been involved in or having inherited the most enormous pyramids, cosa nostras or scams in the history of the world – ongoing scams.

I suggest that it is a combination of those two views. Can they be defeated? Not by us – it needs someone on a higher plane. To my mind, the question of New Zealand is answered in among the links, also America, also about the Crown. It’s going to take some reading, there’s no easy summary and that’s the point – no blogpost can give an easy summary, one has to read and read. Anything less is scholastic laziness.

Treaty of Rome


March 25th 2017 is the 60th anniversary of the United Nations Treaty of Rome which Baron Robert Rothschild and Paul Henri Spaak helped to formulate. The United Nations was founded under the direction of Baron Robert Rothschild with Paul Henri Spaak as the 1st President of the United Nations General Assembly. Spaak was also the 1st President of the Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe.

Some info about the future of the EU here & here.

Some links

Sir Edward Coke:

Aaron Russo:

Really must consider Mullins:

More on the Privy Council:

Teflon Tony:

Remembering that Russell was himself one of the communist lost ones, a personally nasty piece of work in his habits:

Difference Between Birth Certificate And Certificate Of Live Birth,%20BRUSSELS%3B%20PROTOCOL%20REGARDING%20IMMUNITIES%20OF%20BANK%20FOR%20INTL%20SETTLEMENTS.pdf

38 comments for “Part 10: Who rules the world – further reading

  1. March 25, 2017 at 11:22

    One more from our original correspondent:

    I will tell you that I was shocked when I came to New Zealand to find out that I had been living in an illusion for most of my life, not that I have any complaints about how I have lived, but to think one lives in the ‘world’ where most is deception is a bit of a shock. If you ever get the time I would suggest you go to YouTube and watch some of the educational videos made by a New Zealand guy: Bill Turner. There are 2 sections to his work as his site was hacked in 2016. Bill tests his hypotheses in court. It was Bill’s research that showed in New Zealand that the crown or a crown is in fact recognized by the surname-possibly representing a collective name invested in the state. Whether this is the so-called Crown as represented by the Gov. Gen. representing the woman who ACTS as a Queen in England…don’t know or whether its the Crown Temple???

    Kevin Cahill told me that he witnessed the man who acts as pope pay homage to the woman who acts as a queen. This was in the City of London-presumably within those walls. He saw this with his own eyes. Kevin admits he is a freemason of the city.

    As far as I know New Zealand got rid of the Privy Council a couple of years ago. If you go to a website called Detaxcanada by Eldon Warman he explains a bit more about what happened in Canada as Queen Victoria was the last lawful monarch in this country. However, Eldon does not reference his work. I think he is genuine as I have corresponded with him on a number of occasions. He was a political prisoner in California when he told me that he and others challenged the power of the pope in America.

    I did notice on your website about the 1213 so-called Secret Treaty of Verona and Magna Carta not being effectively sanctioned by the people. However, these 2 documents may well lie outside of the people in the Royal prerogative as Kevin Cahill told me there are 3 things that DO NOT require the permission of Parliament as representing the people and that was:

    1. Ratifying a Treaty
    2. Declaring war
    3. Sanctioning the assassination of someone.

    Kevin told me that this is the Royal prerogative. So Tony Blair can surely sleep peacefully at night without fear of being imprisoned and more bullshit is passed onto the people with the bullshit inquiries.

    One more thing, there is an ex lawyer in America called Ed Rivera and he told me that one can never prove that one has the right to vote. Ed teaches the 4 organic laws that started America. However, he seems a bit cagey on other matters.

  2. Distant Relative
    March 25, 2017 at 11:54

    Strange coincidence, some would say, that Teflon Tony’s govt repealed the death sentence for treason and piracy.

    psst.. its Nephilim not Nephalim 😉

    • March 25, 2017 at 12:00

      While I’m here, special thanks to Distant Relative who provided much material.

      The aim here was just to get the material out there, public and you can sort out what you like and don’t as you read and watch.

    • Robin Nigel.
      March 29, 2017 at 11:26

      The Royal prerogative:

      1 Declare war
      2 Assassinate someone
      3 Sign a treaty

      Representative government is not required for this. These 3 things are outside of rep gvmt.

      Piracy. What do you mean by this? We live in a world that sanctions piracy albeit described in other terms. This is base on the Laws of Oleron and Tontine Insurance. This is the Law Merchant= Commercial law. Piracy occurs every day.

  3. March 26, 2017 at 07:01

    He was a political prisoner in California when he told me that he and others challenged the power of the pope in America.

    Um, yeah, OK. You can certainly see the US is run by the Pope. That would be why the Catholic Church has lost every single battle in the culture war in the US.

    Some conspiracy theories are true. That doesn’t mean that all conspiracy theories are true. The world is run by people who have power and money and who intend to hold on to that power and money. There’s no need to bring freemasons or the illuminati or the secret power of the Pope into it.

    Most genuine conspiracy theories aren’t even secret. When the CIA overthrows foreign governments they don’t exactly do it secretly. When George Soros topples foreign government he doesn’t hide what he’s doing. He boasts about it.

  4. Robin Nigel.
    March 26, 2017 at 08:05

    You seem to make an assumption that the Catholic church is the pope and this may be the case, but it may not be as the Catholic church may just be the soft arm to the pagan ( my assumption) behaviour of the Vatican. Of course, I cannot and do not want to argue this case as I ultimately do not know. But the guy in Canada told me that he and others were trying to bring in the Confederation of Articles, but then what the heck is this.

    Anyway, who is the Cia not what is the CIA? It is described as Central so one might presume that in the world ( a place between heaven and hell) it might be the primary secret service agency but of whom. I met a Maori lady in New Zealand and she told me that she used to met people from the NZ SIS in McDonalds. She may having been lying but then again there was no agenda, she told me that they used to keep an eye on MP’s. So who is running the show?

    Ultimately only the people whoever they are, are the ‘creators’ of wealth as all else is just criminal.

  5. Robin Nigel.
    March 26, 2017 at 08:14

    The Birth Certificate. I have searched many Freedom of Information requests online about this and I can tell you( this includes evidence from New Zealand as it is less sophisticated over here) that there is an entry of record into a hardback cover similar to the Rolls of Henry V111 and the information can only be obtained with good reason from a Court. Possibly a Court of Record. I am in the process of dissecting the BC I hold and just on the word BIRTH I have recorded 9 pages of A4 paper and this is about 30% of the information. This document is a fundamental document to what we all find ourselves in and even though its just a piece of paper our parents basically gifted us to something or someone else as we a were adopted on paper.

  6. Distant Relative
    March 27, 2017 at 10:10

    The following was a guest post at the linked blog by “Saturnalia S”, the same person who wrote the arcanerepository article linked in the main article above.

    This is about the Rothschilds and their link to the Jesuits.

  7. March 27, 2017 at 11:03


  8. Distant Relative
    March 27, 2017 at 17:43

    Answer to the question “Does QE11 own 1/6 of Earth’s Land ?”’s-land

  9. Robin Nigel.
    March 29, 2017 at 09:38

    The office of the Queen is the de facto owner= the legal owner. The land in this case, in my opinion, is the ‘landed’ people. Not the dirt/soil. The Queen is an OFFICE- it does not exist in real life. So how can something that does not exist own something that does exist? The soil/dirt.

    ‘Landed’ people do not exist, but only in FORM. Evidence of FORM is the Public Record- Birth Certificate.

    It’s just a game and a very dangerous one at that some of the time.

  10. Robin Nigel.
    March 29, 2017 at 11:08

    The Birth Certificate(BC). The following is thanks to Bill Turner in New Zealand:

    The Birth Certificate is an ESTATE.

    Legal title stems from the BC.

    “They’ always ask for the NAME and the BIRTH DATE, but only hold Legal title to a Certificate, NOT a NAME.

    But One will find that it’s only ”You” that ‘they’ contract with, not a NAME.

    The BC was issued by the government and is issued with a NAME and if we use this NAME we are obligated to them.

    The BC is their property and if we use IT we pay the price.

    Nobody owns the NAME but if we accept responsibility for the NAME then we hold liability for the NAME and must pay.

    This is government issued ID ( it is not our ID and it states this on the long form BC) and it is the Will and intent of the Legislature to be recognised through the NAME.

    NB We have to recognise them through the NAME.

    This is why you must not take your Fathers name in vain.

    What is your Fathers name?=SURNAME. Surety name, surety for a debt.

    In New Zealand it states on the Legislatures website: This ACT binds the Crown.

    So by deduction what is the Crown=the Fathers NAME=Crown. But not your biological Fathers name. Your new Father-the State as the State adopted a THING called a Resident= the identity of a thing, not the identity of the real material, reasoning man, spirit.

    Where did this present day stuff begin?

    Unam Sanctum in 1302. Thanks to Pope Boniface V111. he claimed to be King of the World and this is where the present day Invisible chains began. Hence, all land is claimed as ”Crown Land”.

    In 1666 an Act was passed in England to set us free:

    Cestui Que Vie Act 1666, Chapter 11 18 and 19

    The Statute of Westminster came out in 1275 and we the people were told amongst 3 other things, NOT to respect persons because if we did, we are bound by them.

    The Person is Dead. I have a 16 Century Dictionary and person is a mask. We have persons to our detriment in the system.

  11. Distant Relative
    April 2, 2017 at 11:41

    This was written in the 1920s by Major-General Count Cherep-Spiridovich who sprang “from Norse gentility”.

    “The Secret World Government
    or The Hidden Hand
    The Unrevealed in History
    100 Historical Mysteries Explained”

    I haven’t read it…yet.

  12. Distant Relative
    April 4, 2017 at 15:31

    The Nameless War by Captain A H M Ramsay


    Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay was educated at Eton and the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, and served with the 2nd Battalion Coldstream Guards in the First World War until he was severely wounded in 1916 – thereafter at Regimental H.Q. and the War Office and the British War Mission in Paris until the end of the war.

    From 1920 he became a Member of H.M. Scottish Bodyguard. In 1931 he was elected a Member of Parliament for Midlothian and Peeblesshire.

    Arrested under Regulation 18b on the 23rd May, 1940, he was detained, without charge or trial, in a cell in Brixton Prison until the 26th September, 1944. On the following morning he resumed his seat in the House of Commons and remained there until the end of that Parliament in 1945”

    You mentioned in one or maybe two of the articles in this series, Mr H, that the misty Mrs Christie was on to something. Maybe she was just well versed in what was being or had been written by others?

  13. Distant Relative
    April 7, 2017 at 12:26

    From the same site as above, an out of print book “From Major Jordan’s Diaries”

    ” My reason for writing this book is very simple: I would like to keep the record straight. I want to put in permanent form the full story of my experiences as a Lend-Lease expediter and liaison officer with the Russians during the war, when I served for two crucial years, from May 1942 to June 1944, both at Newark Airport and at the big air base at Grand Falls, Montana.

    I went into the Army as a businessman in my forties and a veteran of World War I. From the First, as my story shows, I worked wholeheartedly on behalf of the Russians because, like everyone else, I considered it my duty to do so. That they were satisfied with my efforts is indicated by the fact that it was Colonel Kotikov, head of the Russian mission at Great Falls, who requested my promotion to Major…..”

    • April 7, 2017 at 22:03

      Why is everyone’s life more interesting than mine?

      • Distant Relative
        April 8, 2017 at 08:48

        Snowflake 🙂

  14. Distant Relative
    April 18, 2017 at 08:47
    • April 18, 2017 at 09:48

      Voltaire of course one of the key illumined and satanist preverts [sic], mind behind the murders.

      • Distant Relative
        April 18, 2017 at 12:26

        What’s a “prevert”? Anyhoo, the wind blows where it pleases. Point is the Bernays stuff, but you knew that already. 🙂

        • April 18, 2017 at 13:02

          What’s a prevert?

          “Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Colonel! Colonel, I must know what you think has been going on here!

          Colonel “Bat” Guano: You wanna know what I think?

          Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Yes!

          Colonel “Bat” Guano: I think you’re some kind of deviated prevert. I think General Ripper found out about your preversion, and that you were organizing some kind of mutiny of preverts. Now MOVE! ”

  15. Distant Relative
    April 28, 2017 at 13:02

    This is currently doing the rounds in some quarters of the web. 39 mins 20. Make sure you watch to the end. Is he telling the truth, partial truth or BS?

    (On a personal level I can vouch for the expectancy of those in the uber echelons of the finance world to put their consciences “in the freezer” – the phrase used in the video – because a near relative of mine almost at that level was taken aside one day and told that his integrity would get in the way of further promotion. His integrity was not and never will be “for sale” and he exited asap.)

    Here’s the vid in Dutch with English subtitles which are easier to read in full screen.

    Make of it what you will.

    • April 28, 2017 at 14:25

      You certainly do stick to it and thus make this series a joint effort and I believe the definitive one now.

      The question of truth, partial truth or BS – ah, that’s the thing, isn’t it? I do have a Dutch contact who is heavily into the political as we are – I’ll ask her to review it too.

      15:33: Right, have watched and this shall be a post on Sunday. I’ve things to add.

    • Distant Relative
      April 28, 2017 at 21:26

      I’m going with “partial truth”. Will expand further, hopefully over the w/e.

  16. Distant Relative
    April 30, 2017 at 08:26

    watched this several time now and here’s my two cents, fwiw. First 22 mins or so – highly plausible, can vouch for certain aspect as mentioned above. 99% treated like sheep, ordinary Joe/Jane more concerned with the superficial than what’s going on at the top of the muck heap- yep! Divide and conquer culture – yep! Money laundering for “Them” – yep! People susceptible to blackmail becoming assists for “Them” – yep! Child sacrifices in Biblical times – yep! (King Solomon did it too so not as wise as we are led to believe! ) Nothing there I haven’t seen or read about before.

    Red flags:
    Who is this guy and were did he suddenly (last few days?) appear from? My mate got on the case last evening trying to find more info on his company but was blocked by a malware warning. Process used was first find a photo of the guy then put into TinEye to see the source if any and take it from there. Nothing found other than what is on youtube, came to a dead end. Could be to protect him?
    How did the interviewer and the interviewee find each other?
    Mention of unspecified torture to stop him revealing names – why not a bullet? If he knows where the money is, so to speak, and who is playing with it surely he would be taking a huge risk spilling the beans? Why is he not in hiding?
    Near Death Experience from a breakdown?
    Just a visitor at a black mass? Can anyone just drop in? Are they in the directory? Maybe something lost in translation there?
    Participating in sacrifices abroad – can’t imagine a scenario when the head honcho says “We have a visitor tonight, Ronald. Ronald would you come down here and sacrifice this child?” out of the blue! And where “abroad” exactly? Not on one of those remote little islands that make up the Netherlands then? I would have thought there’d be some sort of lead up to this first, say witnessing a sacrifice before being asked to perform it, but idk, and hope never to find out! So the shock at having to sacrifice children seems fake to me if he is as astute as he claims to be.
    Trained in psychology, used it to manipulate situations to his own benefit. Manipulating the media, as he says. Hmm.

    Other people the interviewer has interviewed. Icke, Ole Dammegard, Zen Gardner.

    That last one was outed last year as being the PR for “the Family” sex with children cult and has since disappeared off the web.

    They or Them wouldn’t allow this to be out there if they didn’t want it to be. Disinfo usually contains many elements of truth with outrageous unbelievable stuff thrown to create a baby and the bathwater situation.

  17. Distant Relative
    May 14, 2017 at 20:51

    The Deal Associated Press (AP) and Roosevelt Made with Hitler’s Germany

  18. Distant Relative
    May 25, 2017 at 19:17

    “Globalists Created Wahhabi Terrorism To Destroy Islam and Justify a Global State.”

    It’s a point of view. Is it plausible that all this was manufactured? Damned right! Usual suspects.

    • May 25, 2017 at 19:34

      There is always the tendency for the non-Christian to overcomplicate it.

      A Christian just points to Ephesians 6:12 [KJV – they bowdlerised later versions] and there it is. Everything flows from that premise, the pieces all fit into place.

      • Distant Relative
        May 25, 2017 at 19:43

        “There is always the tendency for the non-Christian to overcomplicate it.”

        They (Them) have to cover all bases.

  19. Distant Relative
    June 25, 2017 at 11:43

    For the Globalist Agenda file. Seven (not so secret to some if one gets one’s head out of the sand) Secrets About the World – Revealed Through Syrian War. Some interesting contrasts in the pics too.

  20. Distant Relative
    December 9, 2017 at 10:36
    • December 9, 2017 at 12:41

      This too.

      Funded by the CIA.

    • August 17, 2018 at 18:53

      I have various Springmeier articles too.

Comments are closed.