One of the most frustrating and annoying things to me is mindless assertion by people such as the Randis, Snopeses or Dawkinses, whom I consider fools. In other words, I want to see their evidence for their risible ‘debunkings’, not just rhetoric and attack with no back up.
A second aspect is whether or not a person has an agenda for what he says or writes – it may be that Alex Jones does, he might not, Glenn Beck turned out to have one and was a messed up person – people who go to pieces like that fit very much the pattern described by the Dutchman in the video below.People come out with assertions and ‘plays’ the whole time and you just can’t take them at face value, you have to know their bona fides first.
At the Trump debate with Clinton, the very notion that the moderator could be impartial, doing this straightfaced ‘fact checking’ was also risible, a point made many times since by many pundits – the whole thing was bent.
I come to the vid below with quite a deal of reading under the belt of a different type to someone who, perhaps, studied the classics – while I did my schoolboy time stdying those, it’s still best to defer to someone who knows his Aristotle or Plato.
But equally, I’d expect him to defer to me on something like the Belgian paedo trials because I’ve read every scrap, including the children’s testimonies, the return to the scene of the crime, the shenanigans in shutting down testimony, the blackguards of the royal families and so on.
I’ve also read almost everything on the Franklin Pre-School and Garry Webb cases, from both sides. Ditto on the Omaha Credit scandal. I know the False Memory Syndrome foundation was a construct designed to blunt the testimony and after it did, it fell apart and the fates of the principals makes interesting reading to no one, as no one is remotely interested in pursuing it, which they well know.
The third factor is that certain things come through the whole time – High Masonry, the Illumined, mystery religion, the old boys psychiatric network, whence the drugs with big pharma, the field is just so wide – Eli Lilly, Walter Reed, it goes on and on. MK Ultra is now official, as is Estabrooks but I’d lay odds most of this would go straight past most people for a variety of reasons.
Shoot the messenger
And then we get to the discrediting of the messenger and his/her marginalization – again so predictable, so obvious that you run your debunking in quiet language, in plausible terms which resonate with most people and then google bomb it to top place on page one of rankings.
So we keep coming back to bona fides of people saying things and it’s a hell of a job. I’ve also seen analyses by Snopes types on the clip and the very first question I have is – how are they qualified to pronounce on that?
The fourth factor, tied to agendas, is disinformation, for example put out by the US, through the usual channels – CIA, NATO – designed to confound any who get onto something.
At the same time, they leave some people undebunked, people you’d expect to be, people like Svali. Why? Is it because the story is so OTT, too fantastic to believe? Or is it because they want to suck in conspiracists with seemingly sound information and thus misdirect them away from what’s really going down? Hopefully creating internecine warfare as well.
And so we come to Distant Relative’s vid clip. He writes a preamble:
This is currently doing the rounds in some quarters of the web. 39 mins 20. Make sure you watch to the end. Is he telling the truth, partial truth or BS?
(On a personal level I can vouch for the expectancy of those in the uber echelons of the finance world to put their consciences “in the freezer” – the phrase used in the video – because a near relative of mine almost at that level was taken aside one day and told that his integrity would get in the way of further promotion. His integrity was not and never will be “for sale” and he exited asap.)
Here’s the vid in Dutch with English subtitles which are easier to read in full screen. Make of it what you will.
I have not the least doubt a site will appear at the top of Google rankings – it will be in that restrained, semi-official blue and light beige, with thin lines, the professional typeface equally restrained and respectable and it will follow the Claim-False method of Snopes.
If you take the view it’s all bunkum, then fine, no need to proceed any further.
If you take it at face value – and I’d suggest that just like Jesus as Christ, it’s a take it or leave it scenario – then there are clear implications, aren’t there? For a start, it reinforces post after post at this blog which says it’s all contrived, all planned – every crash, every boom, every war.
And the reasons he went into in the clip – to do with power, the flow of money and keeping the plebs down.
But then it gets into religion – I’ve tried to get rationalists to see this. Yes you can suppress Christianity and every other religion and what are you left with? If you think a religious vacuum, then that is sadly deluded.
The movers and shakers really do believe in a spirit figure, they say as much, Masonry embraces it, as does every controlling organization and if that’s so, then we are truly knackered in society.
In plain sight
While the things in the clip are esoteric and measures are taken to ensure it is so, there’s a game going on in plain sight – symbolism. The game consists of building an arcane symbol, telling people like this girl below that it means something else but knowing that the watchers – us – know precisely what it means and where it’s leading.
Any Christian scholar of sufficient outreach and study would know these symbols and how far back they go – nothing new under the sun – it’s another reason they try to stamp out ‘religious superstition’.
Because if you can create a spiritual vacuum, then you can suggest anything to a credulous population and whoever controls that controls humanity. There is no vacuum, there is a crafty religion of evil behind these things. All that’s happened by suppressing Christianity is that the shepherd has been removed, the wolves can then attack with impunity.
This girl below was the surfer girl at our football club – the clip was posted days ago. For almost all the running time, it was about her surfing career and the fortunes of the club. There was a lot of banter and joshing, she handballed the ball and kicked for goal, he tried to make surfing moves – all of that was on topic.
Then suddenly there were a few seconds only where he was on all fours on the ground and she was riding sidesaddle but not only that, she made these hand symbols, quite pointedly and exaggeratedly:
I’d lay odds she was told he was being a horse and she was told to make that gesture, thinking it was some Yoof symbol of peace and prosperity, something like that. In fact he was a bull and she was riding the same way as below, with the added horned sign to make sure:
Now I’m not interested in debating that with people who either don’t know or have an agenda – this symbolism permeates the UN and EU, it has specific antecedents in myth and legend, it has meaning other than what this lass clearly thinks.
And it is but one small part of it. The things done in vids by Swift, Minaj, Beyonce are so far OTT now that there is no question about what it’s about. It’s also, naturally, secretive – don’t tell anyone who could stop you.
Thus we have:
A one off? Research Slenderman and the killings that started among kids. Also, the deep depression, the crystallizing of naturally depressed thoughts of kids in teenage – remember them [?] into something suicidal – that’s done deliberately and as part of the overall push.
To take a line from the Doors’ Backdoor Man: “The men don’t know but the little girls understand,” you can see the same quiet insinuation into the loves of Yoof – go back to the 60s and look at Leary and the later Merry Pranksters, always designed to depress and turn suicidal, always following the same pattern, always coming through the same portals.
Today, it’s been ramped up to the point that ‘rational’ sceptics are being inundated with cases to deny – there is just so much of it going on now. meanwhile, those who know because they’ve explored shake their heads at the insanity of it all.