Obscene pay rises for useless women

The worst aspect is that, it being the BBC, we have absolutely no say on this matter, though you pay through the TV Licence fee.

The second worst aspect perhaps is that it is doing nothing in the long run for women on the whole, just creating massive resentment against them – and it is the very worst women who are getting these salaries, those whose opinions are not worth a tinker’s cuss.

Tangentially, the story of Marissa Mayer at Yahoo is a salutary lesson, if any would but learn it – mediocre, of limited vision, poor manager, something many warned of many times during her tenure – she nevertheless got a multi-million dollar severance out of it [it was effectively severance], so she’s on clover and laughing. Money for old rope.

But we weren’t compelled to pay for her, as we are with these bints at the Beeb.

Let me qualify this again – there are some sharp, bright women who can hold their own anywhere. Not one of those, not one, is obscenely paid on the public purse like this.

Then there are degrees of competence and uselessness below that.

Just as with men.

But this BBC move is a political move, a feminazi move, the Big Payback for wrongly perceived past wrongs and far from assisting women in society, it makes women in general just as underpaid as ever, with the added factor of deep, quiet resentment which very much colours men’s dealings with them.

It is polarization.

Unfortunately, I’m back in hospital this morning and can’t post till later in the day [if at all – depends what they decide]. As all three posts crammed in this morning are provocative, I should be around for comments [if any] but can’t past 9 a.m., which is not too good for any new commenters, or for Ivan, Dearieme or Amfortas. Hope to be back mid-afternoon.

5 comments for “Obscene pay rises for useless women

  1. james Wilson
    October 13, 2017 at 20:05

    It is extremely unfortunate that the BBC exists, and that you endure a tax to support your enemies. I have not owned a tv for ten years, and watch what programs I watch on computer. Can you escape the tax that way in Britain?

    What is the annual revenue of your tv license?

    • October 13, 2017 at 21:43

      Watching live on computer is under the licence.

  2. Ubermouth
    October 14, 2017 at 12:28

    Rachel Maddow(the woman who would be my girlfriend if I was gay) just won 2 Emmy’s.She earns 7mil a year.Surely she is not considered ‘useless’ or a ‘bint’ given her education.(I believe she holds a PHd).

    • October 14, 2017 at 13:32

      You have this uncanny ability to get the diametric opposite of what is. Mad Cow has been the subject of many posts here and thousands around the world.

      She is not only useless but vindictive and always has her facts wrong. She’s seen as being as much a joke as Corbyn over here. Difference is that Corbyn is a genuine danger.

      Her most recent gaffe was to criminally publish Trump’s tax return – she can go to prison for that – only for it to blow up in her face. Trump’s return showed he’d paid more than he need have. We had a good laugh over that one.

      There is a theory that MSNBC deliberately makes her seem an idiot to normal people. 🙂

      Try these:

      http://www.nourishingobscurity.com/2012/06/parachutee-watch-rachel-maddow/

      https://youtu.be/rQn6GG6sf2A

      Complete and utter idiot but what’s worse is she really believes she’s so right and she ‘pities’ those who actually are correct. LOL.

    • October 14, 2017 at 14:13

      Other’s taste is always astonishing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *