This might be a bit late but let’s do it anyway. Amfortas’s version here.
Peterson: “I had bacon and eggs for breakfast.”
Newman: “So you’re saying that all vegans should be killed?”
Newman: “Let me move on to another controversial debate…”
# It was critical theory vs. critical thinking [Celeste Elizabeth, pictured].
# The discussion is a good cultural reference point. Newman has a hard time accepting the facts and Peterson does not come right out with what the Bible has to say about God which is that Jesus referred to Him 187 times as “father”.
# The interesting thing about Dr Peterson is he started out as a socialist. In, I think, [a] long discourse he has with Dr Jonathan Haidt, he admits in his younger days he was a volunteer for the Canadian socialist NDP. He says that while the rank and file can be good, well-meaning people, the opportunism and hypocrisy of the leadership turned him away from the NDP and its [kind]. As Mr Delingpole would say, Dr Peterson is a sound man.
# The interesting thing about Dr Peterson is he started out as a socialist. So did Peter Hitchens and David Horowitz and many others – it means they know the enemy intimately.
Et moi aussi.
# She won’t learn from the experience, though.
# Ms Newman, so you’re saying you can succeed as a “journalist” without actually grasping any point your interview subject is trying to make?
# This is what debating an imbecile looks like.
Most men of that calibre are superior to all women of that type. There is no comparison – she is an idiot, a victimhood, self-entitled, SJW non-comp.
There do exist women who are “the goods”, who are sheer class and on Twitter, I interact with them all day – we like and value each other, it is a happy situation. There is one at OoL too.
The Cathy Newmans of the world are not these integrally sound women.