This makes reference to the links and comments at this post.
Bill and Distant Relative were wondering about certain things [see link above] and I’ve been exploring their links and others.
Here are the originals of the pictures put out by the press of Tammy Jo Shults:
Note she’s a tall woman, the eyebrows curve up and then down again, broad nose – note the messy hair. The caption of the next pic reads:
Women pilots of Tactical Electronic Warfare Squadron 34 (VAQ-34), Left to Right: Lt. Sue Hart, Lt. Brenda Scheufele, Lt. Pamela (Pam) Lyons Carel, pose for a photograph in front of an F/A-18A Hornet aircraft. Date 1 December 1992.
The image also had this embedded:
Size of head compared to the other two? OK, a search for Pamela (Pam) Lyons Carel brings this up:
It comes from her Twitter account:
… for which this is her avatar:
She joined Twitter in 2013. Don’t look so much at the avatar as at the current day pic [seemingly 2017] above that.
Shults was born Tammie Jo Bonnell around 1962 and grew up on a ranch in New Mexico.
Now this is a different girl whose name I’ve now lost but the hair and eyebrows are interesting, plus the worried expression. Go back up the page and see the pics where the pilot looks worried or concerned in her expression posing for the camera, plus the messy dark hair.
I do think Tammy JS and Pam LC are different people but it hardly gets us out of trouble. The 1992 v 2017 Carel is interesting, also the similarities of the tall women, although the official latest pic of Tammy JS seems right for the ensuing years.
As for the unsuccessful search for Schults, it doesn’t have a “c” in it. I haven’t explored the engine failure pics as yet and any anomalies there.
So, where does that leave us?
In fairness to the Sun and other news sources, the pictures might be all right of TJS as supplied – by the military, which then focuses attention on the military and its disinformation, which is part of its tactics anyway,
What does seem beyond credulity though is the engine sheering off and hitting the plane and the plane still landing peacefully. I’m not referring specifically to this incident but to the plethora of incidents such as the Syrian child in the water, the drowning refugees etc., plus Diane Abbott posting the picture of Israeli planes attacking Iran – later admitted as a photoshop.
It seems to me though that whenever a news story reinforces an agenda, e.g. heroic woman pilot, the faux editing, the sheer dishonesty kicks in, in a way it doesn’t for regular news. It’s as though a different team takes over, one without principle.
It happened with Obama’s birth certificate and college records, it happened on every single atrocity which resembled a Manchurian job, from Sandy Hook onwards.
With the birth certificate, it was largely irrelevant in the end whether the final one was real or not – point was that the White House was leading conspiracists a dance, using quite sloppy editing it was not hard to spot on successive attempts – what the hell was the WH even doing redacting the images, let alone so badly?
Is it ongoing testing to see how much they can put past sharp-eyed conspiracists, to check out how sophisticated the detection is among sceptics? Or is it a conscious attempt to instill in people’s minds the idea that everything is lies – everything?
Or is it just arrogant incompetence, thinking this is good enough to get past the loons? Is it all just a game, a war game with us?