The lying MSM and the elite’s darlings

The inimitable and appreciated James Strong pointed out about smart-arsery some days back and well done.

I said I’d post something from Mark Dice:

I pointed out that smart-arsery was the end product of cynicism but should have added – cynicism borne out over a long period of time.  It is, as mentioned, frustration.

Take, for example, this pair who got married, already planning tours of the world.

Now down to work: Harry and Meghan plan to launch themselves on international stage with major tour Down Under later this year 

Now, they will be meeting and greeting the general populace and of course influencing them, especially if young, so they need to be politically neutral.

But they are not neutral.  They are rabid SJWs.  Charles started all this – his mother did not regurgitate all this PC claptrap in her active years but has now openly endorsed feminism and thus sided with one half of her kingdom … and not the conservative half.

There are may things you can say about the Queen, mostly true, but this is a new, open endorsement of the global elite. Yes yes, we know she’s part of it but at least it was kept neutral in public eyes.  And yes we could argue that it’s better now out in the open where the public can at least see what the royals are up to behind the scenes [see Missing Children post].

The reasons I’m so down on this Meghan are manyfold, the dress being but one tiny part of it but the biggest reason must surely be her palace approved role in pushing a twisted and destructive notion of womanhood on women susceptible to entitlement and victimhood, when so many women themselves [post passim here] have exploded this feminism and it’s never an issue alone, is it?

The things they’re spreading are not only false but they’re destructive for society or in biblical terms – evil:

The transgender thought police: Children as young as FOUR are being told by head teacher at ‘trans-friendly’ primary school to tell on pupils who ‘misgender’ their classmates

This is the sort of evil, with real victims of a defenceless kind, which Hal and Megs are preparing to go round the world, trading on their young royal wedding goodwill, and pushing.

And that is what is frustrating and that is why the deep cynicism and anger, and that is why the “smart-arsed” comments.  It’s only “smartarsed” in the eyes of someone who does not share our concerns over these things.

To someone who does share them, it is grim humour [I daren’t say black humour] because what else is left after dismay?

Now, back to Megs – if you needed any more accurate testimonial to her character, albeit in a seemingly frivolous way, it was that bee which stung/pestered Harry yesterday and which the MSM lapped up.  Not one question about her reaction, was there?

What would you do, were it your partner?

I’m accused here of being “malicious”, “smart-arsed” and all sorts but my immediate reaction towards my spouse would be concern for her wellbeing – bee stings are nasty.  And what did Megs do?  Go into a fit of the giggles – that is the mentality which so many have now commented on – I am certainly not alone in this – not to be “malicious” but to point out that here is a bad ‘un.

And finally, what is the latest on this “bad ‘un”?

A VERY special relationship: Why Meghan for US President isn’t as crazy as it sounds!

I began blogging way back when, as one of the few pointing out about the global elite I termed Them in those days and was castigated, dismissed and ignored for it.  Tinfoil hats were mentioned.

Not now – events have caught up. [Incidentally, look at fellow blogger Sackerson’s url.]

I’m saying this about Megs – she is their creature through and through, while Harry comes across as a bit of an immature fool.

Can’t I just have a little “compassion and heart” to let them have their wedding day of adoration without snide remarks?

Can’t I just have a little “compassion and heart” to let the jihadis groom and gang rape without snide remarks?

8 comments for “The lying MSM and the elite’s darlings

  1. Bill
    May 23, 2018 at 11:35
    • May 23, 2018 at 13:06

      Even Dari gets a mention. Fine man, hasn’t killed all that many.

  2. May 24, 2018 at 01:27

    “Now, back to Megs – if you needed any more accurate testimonial to her character, albeit in a seemingly frivolous way, it was that bee which stung/pestered Harry yesterday and which the MSM lapped up. Not one question about her reaction, was there?

    What would you do, were it your partner?

    I’m accused here of being “malicious”, “smart-arsed” and all sorts but my immediate reaction towards my spouse would be concern for her wellbeing – bee stings are nasty. And what did Megs do? Go into a fit of the giggles – that is the mentality which so many have now commented on – I am certainly not alone in this – not to be “malicious” but to point out that here is a bad ‘un.”

    Ermm… No people were harmed in this incident Harry was buzzed by a bee that startled/distracted him. His reaction was cute and so were the reactions of his family members including his new wife.

    Loving, caring family members enjoying shared laughter and comfort with each other.

    This is quite typical of family life, forming bonds, memories and laughter over the years.

    • May 24, 2018 at 06:45

      No.

      Where to start when so many are mentioning nature’s clearest warning signs, people from both sides of the political divide by the way.

      The ostrich is a lovely bird.

      • May 24, 2018 at 22:18

        Shouting ‘No’ at me and calling me names does not prove a counter argument about how family members react with each other.

        • May 25, 2018 at 07:14

          Sigh.

          I’ve always gone out of my way to avoid insulting you or any lady by name but if you say it is so, then it must be so, for you are a lady. For any breaches of gallantry, please accept my most profound apologies.

  3. Toodles McGhee
    May 25, 2018 at 20:42

    Are you from Dixie, James?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *