By chance, I found myself looking at the Alt-right on google and I’ve never seen such a load of twaddle as a definition – they’re all at it, from wikipedia to Google to the MSM to the left to the establishment to the globalists to the satanists [all the same lot].
In the interest of developing a core Alternative Right philosophy upon which others can build.
- The Alt Right is of the political right in both the American and the European sense of the term. Socialists are not Alt Right. Progressives are not Alt Right. Liberals are not Alt Right. Communists, Marxists, Marxians, cultural Marxists, and neocons are not Alt Right. National Socialists are not Alt Right.
- The Alt Right is an ALTERNATIVE to the mainstream conservative movement in the USA that is nominally encapsulated by Russel Kirk’s 10 Conservative Principles, but in reality has devolved towards progressivism. It is also an alternative to libertarianism.
- The Alt Right is not a defensive attitude and rejects the concept of noble and principled defeat. It is a forward-thinking philosophy of offense, in every sense of that term. The Alt Right believes in victory through persistence and remaining in harmony with science, reality, cultural tradition, and the lessons of history.
- The Alt Right believes Western civilization is the pinnacle of human achievement and supports its three foundational pillars: Christianity, the European nations, and the Graeco-Roman legacy.
- The Alt Right is openly and avowedly nationalist. It supports all nationalisms and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and immigration.
- The Alt Right is anti-globalist. It opposes all groups who work for globalist ideals or globalist objectives.
- The Alt Right is anti-equalitarian. It rejects the idea of equality for the same reason it rejects the ideas of unicorns and leprechauns, noting that human equality does not exist in any observable scientific, legal, material, intellectual, sexual, or spiritual form.
- The Alt Right is scientodific. It presumptively accepts the current conclusions of the scientific method (scientody), while understanding a) these conclusions are liable to future revision, b) that scientistry is susceptible to corruption, and c) that the so-called scientific consensus is not based on scientody, but democracy, and is therefore intrinsically unscientific.
- The Alt Right believes identity > culture > politics.
- The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.
- The Alt Right understands that diversity + proximity = war.
- The Alt Right doesn’t care what you think of it.
- The Alt Right rejects international free trade and the free movement of peoples that free trade requires. The benefits of intranational free trade is not evidence for the benefits of international free trade.
- The Alt Right believes we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children.
- The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, people, or sub-species. Every race, nation, people, and human sub-species has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers.
- The Alt Right is a philosophy that values peace among the various nations of the world and opposes wars to impose the values of one nation upon another as well as efforts to exterminate individual nations through war, genocide, immigration, or genetic assimilation.
There is another term – Dissident-Right and so it’s probably time to get terms clear or rather out of where they arose. The Alt-right pretty well came out of Gamergate and all that, it’s an online phenomenon which then spread and is populated by basically cool dudes like vox who are “modern” traditionalist – they’re far more “with it than conservatives”.
The two major issues with the right sphere as a whole are:
There are many who would call themselves Alt or Dissident Right but they’e as anti-Christian as any marxist or illuminati/mason. And yet Christianity is very much part of European history/culture, i.e. Christendom.
There are also many gays who want in on this and yet this is a progressivist thing, certain not conservative and in the generally accepted sense of the word. These issues have not been resolved and so the right, in all its forms, is fractured.
3. Fame-seeking women
There’s much grumbling about people like Lauren Southern, Tomi Lahren and Faith Goldy, to mention three and the criticism is that they are into themselves and being the great dissident female journo. Some time back, Tomi Lahren went on The View and spouted leftwing views on abortion, just one issue showing that women are often suspect ideologically and if anything, will tend left before right if they’re not clear in their minds.
It’s this ideological “all over the place -edness” which is the major criticism of them by the right.
I regard myself as being of the Dissident Right and see that as not being primarily online [but we can be], affirming all Vox’s points bar 3, 4, 8 and 13, which I feel need to be rewritten – there at least needs to be debate about them.
I’d also put in low taxation, traditional educational methods, equality of opportunity but not outcome but fear that there is a certain anti-woman feeling amongst many of the alt-right or dissident right, which fails to recognize the difference between the ordinary conservative woman and other silly bints.
An analogy I would like to offer is the colour blue. To ask if I like blue is a meaningless question in my mind because I can’t stand royal blue and shades around that but adore navy, cobalt and the flatter, matter shades. Royal blue in fact is my least favourite colour, navy my favourite.
Ditto with women – that sub-species includes the humans I adore the most and also contains humans I detest the the most. You could extend this analogy to “blonde”. Certain types of natural blonde are my very favourite but there are other types right down the other end – the worst types.
Because of this impossibility of lumping all under one heading and because the dissident right is so individualistic, you could easily have four of us, say, who largely accept Vox’s points and yet we can vehemently differ on certain issues, quite aggressively so.
The dissident right has overtones of the maverick, the aggressive, the curmudgeonly, we’re pains in the derriere, equally disliked by the leftist right [e.g. the Tories, RINOs] and the traditional enemy – the left. Our first instinct with any new proposal is to scrutinise and if found wanting, take it apart.
We favour confederations and alliances rather than federations with politburos. This is a quite dissident right blog.