There is no more important topic than this and yet there is no topic more fraught with disinformation, refusal to consider, dismissal and a hundred obstacles to understanding. There is no topic more heavily dependent on copious pre-reading and having followed it for years.
You simply can’t come in with peripheral glances and then decide on that basis. And yet who will do that pre-reading, as it is sordid and mired with mistruths at every step.
There is a topic today by me at N.O., a personal topic and that’s real to me. There is all the Comey/Soubry/Adonis/Strzok guff also going on to distract everyone and it also is both theatre, yet real in what it is trying to prevent. We need to report on every single one of these, but not to the exclusion of the really dark atrocities going on.
To cover these up, there’s another layer of atrocities:
Yep, it’s the world of the Toronto killing, the Muslim rape gangs, vans ploughing into crowds and all that … except it’s not just the Muslims, is it? There are certainly Rotherham, Telford and all the rest of them but what is desperately kept out of the news are the care homes here and on Jersey, plus the Belgium horrors I posted on, plus now pizzagate.
And there is uncanny coincidence going on – if I forget to post on a topic because there are so many other topics to cover, suddenly, there it is in all its sickening detail in front of me. What am I to do?
And yet again, those not able to access Twitter are missing the cutting edge of news – that is the platform, despite the attempts by management, which brings what is and what isn’t, which is why the Donald uses it, as does every major player today.
But there is so much deliberate misinformation put out and it gets thicker the closer you get to the truth. That girl’s photo could be a faked one, easily, her name fake, her current day avatar faked … could be, could be faked, I’ve seen some which seem more and more to be fake.
But not all. Alisha Owen and Paul Bonacci were real, the testimony by the girls in Belgium was real. We know Harman and Hewitt supported PIE, we see these animals now openly pushing child sex, including Whoopi Goldberg who was seen on The View asking is it so bad if the child initiates it? WTF? What is going on now? These people are abetting crimes. And don’t forget Corey Feldman on Hollywood.
Plus it’s interwoven:
It’s not as if we weren’t warned – Cyril Smith, Epstein, Airmiles Andy, Dolphin Square and even if Cliff Richard was let off, why did the police choose him and not, say, Joe Bloggs down the road? Why him? Because there is so much iffy about that man – I did not say conclusively proving guilt but you could find the story with very little research needed.
I say you could once access it because there’s something else going on now, isn’t there – the removal of material from the web.
Don’t you understand that this is the Man we’re messing with here, these are the actual rulers of darkness.
Let’s come back to this woman Sarah Ruth Ashcraft, this is her thread for those who can access it. I’m sorry, I’m not doing multiple screenshots for the non-Twitterised.
Now immediately I say to you – you don’t need to tell me about scamming, jumping on bandwagons – in the 90s it was to do with Cheney, now it’s HRC. I buy what you say, I’m not a fervent believer … but I am a believer because of the sheer weight of evidence which has come through since the 70s.
And sometimes they give themselves away. The False Memory Syndrome lot were specifically set up to debunk child claims and how easy is it to dismiss a child, yes? How reliable is a child? Would you believe your own child if he/she came up with some fantasy about tunnels?
And yes, I buy the criticism about coercion by the interviewers – we’ve seen evidence of that too. But not in all cases – as one of the main players noted in the 80s – what, was there a worldwide conspiracy of toddlers?
After it had all died down and the False Memory Syndrome people faded away, anyone who cared to look up the major players saw establishment figures with dubious connections and in some cases crimes against their own names.
You have to dig to find these things, ask Google the right questions, not the usual questions.
But then came the open evidence – the 1973 MK Ultra prosecution, the Owen and Bonacci story, Belgium and now people are thinking hmmm, maybe there is something to this. And what do you see the evidence doing? Dying away, uncorroborated? No, you’re seeing new allegations every so often.
No, I don’t uncritically accept this woman, mainly because her initials are SRA – those with eyes will see the significance of this. I could well have one of the many establishment released scams here but for each one of these perpetrated, how many are left uncovered? She is certainly not saying anything I was not well aware of from the years of looking for evidence.