Before this post starts, the very nature of the subject means it can be taken down under coercion at any moment. Therefore, it would be wise to archive at least the links in comments.
Without any further ado:
We’re now living in a world of the Toronto killing, the Muslim rape gangs, vans ploughing into crowds and all that … except it’s not just the Muslims, is it? A now deceased Liberal MP for Rochdale was asked about this and Andrew’s pal Jeffrey Epstein could not be contacted for comment.
Yes, there were certainly Rotherham, Telford and all the rest of those but there were also the care homes on, say, Jersey, plus the Belgium horrors previously posted on, plus pizzagate, in each case with a concerted campaign to cover up, dismiss, mock or post academic articles debunking the notion, such articles straight to the top of search engine rankings.
What it needs of course is public outcry in every western nation for genuine inquests for starters but fat chance of that, eh?
That girl’s photo could be faked, granted, it could be real, she might be telling the truth or making it up – it at least deserves to be investigated thoroughly, as with every other similar case.
Alisha Owen and Paul Bonacci were real enough, the testimony by the girls in Belgium was real – I waded through much of that while it was still available.
We know Harman and Hewitt support PIE, we see these animals now openly pushing child sex, including Whoopi Goldberg who was seen on The View asking is it so bad if the child initiates it? WTF?
These people are openly abetting crimes against the person, against minors. And don’t forget Corey Feldman’s testimony on Hollywood.
But it’s far more – it’s networked, it’s interwoven:
It’s not as if we weren’t warned – Cyril Smith, Epstein, Airmiles Andy, Dolphin Square and even if Cliff Richard was finally let off and Plod shown to be vicious bunglers, it was certainly no summer holiday for all the victims of whomever Mr. X turns out to be.
Let’s come back to this woman Sarah Ruth Ashcraft, this is her thread for those who can access it.
The False Memory Syndrome lot were specifically set up to debunk child claims and how easy it is to dismiss a child, yes? How reliable is a child? Would you believe your own child if he/she came up with some fantasy about tunnels?
There is plausible criticism about coercion by the interviewers in the McMartin case. But not in all cases? As one of the main investigators noted in the 80s – what, was there some worldwide conspiracy of toddlers going on here to falsify their stories?
After it had all died down and the False Memory Syndrome people had faded away, anyone who cared to look up the major players in that group would see establishment figures with dubious connections … and still some people tenaciously cling to the idea that it was all false memories or invented.
Were that all it was, an isolated case by one perp, then all right, maybe it was a hoax for some reason:
But it was not isolated – and add to that the kidnappings, spirit cooking, the nature of the Podesta ‘art’ and who the people are involved in it, then it does stretch credulity to say nothing to see here, move on.
An era of new, open evidence began in 1973 with the MK Ultra prosecution and inquiries, then came the Belgian horror in the late 80s and it became apparent that there were serious people behind it, it went to the top in Europe at least.
The N1 question remains – how to stop this tidal wave if most people either remain unaware, don’t wish to know or can’t take it onboard because it seems the product of sick minds, which it is, but whose? The whistleblowers or the alleged perps?
The comments thread might help you decide. Once again, it would help to archive the links and possibly dates and some text, perhaps on a usb stick.