Sweet ladies, don’t you think? Especially the one on our left [Karla Homolka].
As you may already have gathered, I have issues with these three pieces below, less so with the youtube one.
Is it possible that women can get away with certain crimes more than men because society is less likely to expect certain antisocial or violent behaviors among them?
[Y]oung women who later develop the disorder show a more relational form of aggression characterized by jealousy, self-harm, manipulation, and verbal aggression.
Female psychopaths operate in more nuanced, less overtly physically aggressive ways, though they can ultimately lead to equally destructive outcomes.
The female psychopaths I have assessed are every bit as dangerous as their male peers.
I would say far more so because you can see the male psycho coming – just look at the jihadis – but the female is far more subtle, she can embark on long campaigns against the object of her ire – it’s the sign of a weak person and now we’re getting pussified males increasingly doing this as well.
In fact, I’d say that the word psychopath for the female is a bit misleading – all women to a certain extent are insane, all men to an extent are uncaring and thoughtless about others.
Are they all psychos? At what point does one diagnosis psychopathy? At the point of an act of violence? For example nurses poisoning those in their care?
I’d say there is so much low-level psychopathy in women – that relation who was always such a bitch to you, the manipulating of power figures to hurt the other etc. etc.
These include lack of empathy, guilt or remorse, and being manipulative and deceitful.
Show me a non-deceitful woman who never manipulates? Every time she makes herself up and dresses a certain way, it is to achieve an effect, to play down weaknesses, to boost assets.
The male – look at road rage, which used to be the preserve of the male, look at the Billionaire Boy’s Club type mind, the Nick Leeson mind, look at the entire hidden govt establishment and its sickness of the pizzagate type.
I’d say that in a male, a certain psychopathy is a positive boon – look at Generals Kelly and Mad Dog Matis again – it certainly gets results and keeps the ship tightly run. Look at the Donald himself. It’s his very psychopathy I like, because it keeps everyone on his toes.
I certainly have elements of it, not a doubt and it’s kept me bully-free during my lifetime. In a female though – not good, because it is combined with other female traits and the mix is toxic, even lethal. Any woman worth her salt knows how to tame the beast and use him for her own ends and that of her family.
I’m suggesting that this is all pretty normal behaviour or if not normal, then pretty standard behaviour and nothing to get over-anxious about.
I know a lady who likes curmudgeons because underneath that exterior, they’re going to treat her well. I don’t know one wild man who does not treat ladies well face to face. You can call them sexist bstds, I call them soaked in chivalry.
The tests of psychopathy, IMHO
1. If they just don’t care for other humans in any way, full stop, period.
Careful here – I know a guy who seems one of these but truth is he does these little things for others all the time which wreck his reputation as Chief Psychopath.
And when this is a woman, then there is a huge amount of misery ahead for some poor sod[s], like slow, low-level torture. In fact, these are monsters. There are many in the “caring” professions.
2. They wish harm to others, rather than for others’ stupidity to be stopped.
Careful here again – wishing Gina Miller to fall off the cliff, if that’s psychopathy, then so was PG Wodehouse in hoping AA Milne would break his neck. Also schadenfreude – who hasn’t felt it?
No, I’m referring here to actually harming others, either physically or psychologically and I don’t mean snowflakes being offended, although many of those are psychos in many ways, especially for reason one above.
3. They feel they’ve been wronged and are excessive in their revenge.
I’m thinking of Clyde Barrow here who certainly had a rough time early but to go as far as he did and to drag Bonny with him – that’s a sign of a psycho. They often cry about how hard done by they are.
Go back to the example of the girl who killed her rabbit because it was annoying her. Excessive. There was a cartoon about the jihadi murdering dozens and then saying, “Now look what you’ve made me do!”
4. They derive pleasure from cruelty and sick things.
This can be sexual, non-sexual. Anyone who adores films like Saw and other horrors has psycho tendencies, not a doubt of it. Ditto those who like pulling the wings off butterflies. Sicko pleasures are a major indicator. Those who get off on slow motion violence.
I detest it although I’d certainly blow someone away who genuinely looked like physically harming me and mine, not the slightest compunction – but that’s real life, not film. I don’t know a good man or woman who would not do that to protect family and self.
Who liked 50 Shades? Psycho!