Indications of false flag

I tweeted the moment it happened that this stank of false flag, colleagues and other friends also took to the ether and said the the same. There was something so wrong which this woman [NZ PM] has so cackhandedly milked for its ban-guns value and draconian other legislation that this was either a satansend for Them or else it was planned to the nth, as were all the others.

This from one of the comments thread summed up the feeling over these days as the NZ govt stepped in:

This nightmare in Christchurch has troubled the whole world for days, and what you just shared begins to make the pieces fit together. There was an instant push for gun control everywhere as soon as this story broke. If the citizens can be disarmed, the elites can have their way. And New Zealand seems to be the escape of choice for the globalists to ride out a world war in safety, so it would make sense to protect the elites from those pesky NZ citizens with guns.

PS: I watched the video, too. Perhaps it was like you can take your eyes off an impending train wreck. And one thing that puzzled me was that the bullets made no visible impact on the victims’ bodies. I wasn’t looking for gore, but was looking for evidence.

What was just shared?  We’re getting to that.  First the most nauseating sight downunder:

Just what is this idiot below playing at, turning that country into a Muslim outpost of the caliphate? Is that what the whole of their history has now come to?

Kindness, compassion?  What the hell is this woman on?

But of course, as we know, along came the gun ban and then questions about the video of the shooting, anomalies maybe.

On March 16, 2019, two days after the shootings, freelance Ohio-based journalist Nick Monroe retweeted a message from WellingtonLive, a news media company, that the New Zealand government had banned the mosque-shooting video. New Zealanders are told not to download the video. Anyone found to “knowingly” possess a copy of the video will face up to 10 years in prison; anyone who shared the video will get up to 14 years in prison. Corporations (such as web hosts) face an additional $200,000 ($137,000 US) fine under the same law.

Interesting, eh?

At the 5:57 mark of the video, the gunman gets out of his car, accompanied by the brisk and cheerful tune of the British Grenadiers, the band of Her Majesty’s Coldstream Guards. From where is the music streaming??? He retrieves a rifle from the trunk of the car, and proceeds to walk into the compound of Al Noor Mosque.

As he enters the mosque, he begins shooting (6:38 mark).

His first victim is a man in a blue top and blue pants, who is shot at the doorway. Note that the man is the only body at the doorway.

It becomes curiouser and curiouser:

In an audio interview, Professor James Fetzer, a former U.S. Marine second lieutenant, and Dr. Scott Bennett, former U.S. Army Psychological Operations Officer and State Department Counterterrorism Contractor, made the following observations:

Fetzer said the semi-automatic rifles deployed by the mosque shooter are fakes made of plastic, designed to make noise.

Bennett points out the video shows no bullet holes and no exploding glass because no solid projectiles were used by the gunman, which means nothing solid impacted the victims’ bodies, which means “no living person was legally killed or wounded”.

No blood spatter on the victims, walls, or furniture.

In a real shooting with real bullets, especially when civilians are shot, they would be in a state of hysterical, emotional shock. Panic-stricken, their bodies flooded with adrenalin, they would violently flail, run or crawl away.

They do not simply fold up and fall to the ground like sacks of potatoes. Read more about Dr. Bennett’s forensic analysis of the shootings on James Fetzer’s blog.

Then some other curiosities appear:

There are now two bodies lying in the doorway — the gunman’s first victim and another man, probably the man seen running at the 8:10 mark, then shot three times (8:14 mark).

Still no blood but guess what – he goes back to his car, comes back and lo and behold – blood everywhere. Neither the video nor the pics are included in this post.

Ladies and gentlemen – this is the same playbook as 911 and Patriot Act, Sandy Hook, in fact every one of these and all the players in this farce play exactly the same roles, the trolls are sent around to pooh-pooh and label rightwing nutters as murderous thugs.

9 comments for “Indications of false flag

  1. Bill
    March 23, 2019 at 08:21

    That shrouded head looks very manly to me.

    • March 23, 2019 at 08:23

      Aye. Hermaphrodite.

    • Distant Relative
      March 23, 2019 at 09:26 She’s a tranny. Notice strange appendage between her legs. :0

      All the scumbags (so called “elites”) hang out in NZ. NZ FF was a Skull’n’Bones production. I left all the clues on a post here some days ago.

      • pete
        March 24, 2019 at 21:28

        I just watched a few YTs of her and she doesn’t appear to have a prominent adams apple and she apparently had a baby last year – there’s definitely something under that dress – have folk reconciled with being lied to? – obama: “Michael and I….”

        • Distant Relative
          March 24, 2019 at 21:55

          Re the baby – surprising what is available these days 🙂
 Also see their “home” page.
          Many celebs use these allegedly when they are using surrogates – Beyonce, Amal Clooney, Meghan.
          What is under that dress is very odd.

          Re Michael – was Joan Rivers joking when she said on camera that O was gay and M was a tranny and everyone in Hollywood I think she said (?) knew it? Dunno. One think I’ve learnt – never accept what Them tell us at face value. What ever Jacinda is – s/he ain’t on our side!

  2. Distant Relative
    March 23, 2019 at 09:48

    Videos on this topic are being removed from Youtube faster than one can utter FF.
    Claims “bullying”.

  3. March 23, 2019 at 10:57

    Cheers as always.

  4. Distant Relative
    March 23, 2019 at 19:04

    When the shtf re the corruption of the Clinton charities (pay-to-play schemes) and the players involved, it should be obvious by now why Jac-the-lad wants the New Zealander’s guns.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.