Caption time, developer sues Boohoo, feminazi abortion

1. Captions please:

2.  Serious money, no value:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-48595271

A web developer is suing the founder of online fashion retailer Boohoo for £118.5m amid claims he reneged on a promise to reward him for creating the firm’s website.

Richard Womack has brought a claim against billionaire Mahmud Kamani for breach of an agreement.

He claims he was promised a 10% share in the Manchester-based company and was essentially Boohoo’s “third founder”.

A spokesman for Mr Kamani described the claim as “entirely without merit”.

Greed?

3.  Intersectional tapdancing – another nutter:

https://davidthompson.typepad.com/davidthompson/2019/06/the-other-heartbeat-isnt-yours.html

I am not interested in where a human life starts to exist.

In the video linked above, feminist “theorist” Sophie Lewis informs us that the foetus, a nascent human being, is “violent,” does violence to “gestators,” and that abortion is a corrective killing, an “unmaking,” a means of “going on strike against gestational work.” “We need to move away from… arguments around when human life begins,” says she.

So far as I can tell, and despite Ms Lewis’ theorising, mothers-to-be don’t generally feel a need to parse their pregnancy in terms of “abolishing the private nuclear household” and “global regimes of colonial and commodity exploitation.” Or indeed to champion abortion, via drugs or dismemberment, as a form of “anti-violence.” But that’s probably because – to borrow a phrase from Joan – they haven’t been tugging on the intersectional crack pipe.

Hardly feel the need to add to that.

[H/T Chuckles and haiku]

5 comments for “Caption time, developer sues Boohoo, feminazi abortion

  1. Distant Relative
    June 14, 2019 at 16:56

    1. “The last one had a strange appendage down there….seems to be missing in this one….”
    2. Boohoo? Will it all end in tears? This is the company, IIRC, that’s banning wool from its products because they claim wool isn’t environmentally friendly.
    3. There must be a factory somewhere churning out these numpty theorists – probably cloned.

  2. Andy5759
    June 14, 2019 at 19:21

    1. Now why couldn’t Harry find one like you?

  3. ivan
    June 14, 2019 at 21:26

    #1 Corgis, no chewing toes.

    #2 If it isn’t in the contract it is meaningless – things said have no meaning unless they were recorded. Sounds like a so called web designer has a head too big for the doorway.

  4. Doonhamer
    June 14, 2019 at 22:03

    Mmm. She appears to have one tit lower than the other.

  5. June 14, 2019 at 22:24

    The original caption was about the Queen checking that there wasn’t anything bulging there like the previous FLOTUS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.