Pinterest backlash, paedo leader

This is about two stories – the first from the Wail:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7132879/Whistleblower-reveals-Pinterest-BANNED-pro-life-group-Live-Action.html

Whistleblower reveals how Pinterest BANNED pro-life group Live Action by categorizing it as porn and censored Bible verses as ‘sensitive terms’

Right, the whistleblower is, of course, a pretty girl and so we have the first issue – the scurrilous click-bait nature of the press, with the Express maybe the most brazen user of it I’ve seen, the Wail not far behind.

It hardly need be spelt out but let’s anyway. Pinterest is like all the other tech giants/platforms – was started up or financed by someone:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinterest

As always, I want to know how it happened – how did one person or a group at the top all think, politically, the same way, with the same prejudices and same lack of principle in applying the rules. The same concept of ‘community standards’?

Prior to Pinterest (which launched in March 2010), Silbermann worked at Google in the online advertising group.[5] However, after a short time with the company he left and started designing his own iPhone apps with a college friend, Paul Sciarra. After their initial application, Tote, failed to gain significant traction,[6] the cofounders teamed up with Evan Sharp to create a pinboard product that would eventually be named Pinterest.[5] Silbermann says that the genesis of Pinterest really came from his love of collecting as a kid.

Noted entrepreneurs and investors include: Jack Abraham, Michael Birch, Scott Belsky, Brian Cohen, Shana Fisher, Ron Conway, FirstMark Capital, Kevin Hartz, Jeremy Stoppelman, Hank Vigil, and Fritz Lanman.[21]

So what do you take from that?

Well firstly, I relied on Wikipedia for my facts and that was through search engine Google, whence Silberman sprang.  And if you follow those links, that of Evan Sharp, for example, comes up. Bright boys in one way, political clones in another, like Zuckerberg, like Dorsey, like Youtube’s Wojcicki.

Somewhere in this tale, big money for R and D appears, it’s not a case of going to your local manager.  Those on hand to lend put the borrower through scrutiny – is he or she ‘sound’?  if so, the money flows and that company comes out on top, is given much advice.

That seems to be the way it goes.  The left would call this Capitalism, the sane might call it crony capitalism or entrepreneurship but actually, it’s far more – it’s quite politically stringent.  Only a certain type gets through, gets backed, gets the breaks.

Much has been made of the failure of the non-left, non-establishment to set up such things as Pinterest and yet I know people of the requisite skill, even the ability to run a company … but they never do … or at least that company runs into trouble.

Why?

The other tale concerns a Dutch school and the details seem sketchy, plus who the reporters were, why they were on the scene, how the kids left the grounds to talk to them.

Apparently, paedophilia came up in a middle-school class discussion and the teacher countered by saying that Mo was one, with Aisha or whatever her name was. It was not just the Muslim kids in the class who took umbrage at that, it was the indigenous too.

Teacher was suspended.

Outside the grounds, ordered off by the principal, they interviewed these kids and two were outspoken – a Muslim girl, plus a Dutch, a budding SJW, narrative down pat.

The thing centred around Mo having been called a paedo. The interviewer said – well he was. And what?

Choruses of no, no, no. Then the Muslim girl said – well he had no right [the teacher] to disrespect the prophet. They were all incensed, the kids, calling the teacher a paedo.

There’s no way to know the full story but it does seem iffy that the teacher spoke of it with kids – one hopes he was not another Patricia Hewitt or Harbag. Then again, headteachers are welcoming trannies and dragshows for kids now.

Equally as worrying to me though was the way the non-Muslim kids, who MUST have seen all the atrocities across Europe, who must use social media, could just blindly support the Muslim in her wrongness, factually.

It’s a fair question to ask – well what do I suggest here? That the Dutch kids ostracise the Muslim kid in her bin liner? Because clearly that’s not on once the kid is enrolled.

The damaging thing is that she’s even there. You can see the kids’ notions of love everyone, peace and mutual understanding and those are good things to aspire to.

Yet that kid is backed by a family indulging in throwback practices and the leading lights in that community have clearly stated that they’re going to replace the west with Shariah.

What does one do?

4 comments for “Pinterest backlash, paedo leader

  1. June 13, 2019 at 07:54

    “”Right, the whistleblower is, of course, a pretty girl …”” Nope. It was a bloke, as can be seen clearly on the Interview…. one where his face is hidden, and one after he was fired and interviewed again, with face showing.

    • June 13, 2019 at 08:51

      Think I failed to do the irony well there. It had a pretty girl’s photo plastered over the left of the post but no link to her. Clickbait.

  2. June 13, 2019 at 07:59

    O’Keefe’s video, original, has been taken down.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ko43yVdowMU

    But Tucker Carlson’s is still up

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9AM6N1Zi80

  3. June 14, 2019 at 01:01

    Much has been made of the failure of the non-left, non-establishment to set up such things as Pinterest and yet I know people of the requisite skill, even the ability to run a company … but they never do … or at least that company runs into trouble.

    Why?

    To set up non-SJW versions of these social media type outlets you’d need to be able to afford to lose obscene amounts of money. Which means you’d need to be seriously rich.

    The problem here is that people who are seriously rich like things just the way they are. They don’t have to pay the price for the SJW madness. Money protects you from stuff like that. And the constant SJW hysteria ensures that nobody notices that our society is organised solely for the benefit of the rich.

    Of course you might think that there’d be at least a handful of very rich people who would have some decency and some principles. If you think that you don’t understand how the rich work. They believe that non-rich people are a seperate and inferior species.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.