Monday too

1. Not really naive, more the state of affairs in this country now:

2. The interest in this one is looking at the dilemma DJT is in over Javanka:

3. It is NOT tinfoil hat territory, it’s a real plan and it is being implemented:

4. Warning – sickos at work:

5. Across the pond and further afield:

6. Make a note in your diaries:

7. Important:

[H/T Chuckles and haiku]

7 comments for “Monday too

  1. Bruce Charlton
    July 22, 2019 at 17:59

    Re 2. Perfectly correct. From United Nations Population Division website:

    “United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.

    “Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates. ”

    It’s a chicken and egg kind of thing – Mass (atheistic) leftist nihilism and demoitivation synergising with (demonic) elite leftist aggression.

  2. Judd
    July 22, 2019 at 18:57

    Low fertility be buggered, most of us silly natives have the number of children we can afford to bring up decently by our own toil without being a burden on the state…by the state i mean other taxpayers as the govt has no money of its own, despite them p’ing it up the wall like confetti.

    Another chicken and egg quandry is how many normal people, seeing the continued and worsening decline of our country, thanks in no small way to the volumes of replacements already here and their unsavoury or violent customs and practices, have decided they do not wish what is coming upon their own children, so simply don’t have any.

    • July 22, 2019 at 19:32

      Now Judd, that is biblical. It does say woe is those with chn in those times. Not many have made this connection yet.

  3. Bruce Charlton
    July 23, 2019 at 08:58

    With further reference to 2 – this is a striking example of the supernatural ‘law’ by which, apparently, evil need to tell (or warn) what specifcially it intends to do, before doing it. If not a law, this happens remarkably often – and may be the basis of the stereotypical gloating or monologuing villain in popular culture.

    Of course, the interpretation is dishonest – we are doing it for your own good, for the good of the economy etc; and of course it will not work and will instead cause chaos and collapse – but it is remarkable that there are explicit plans to replace the populations of the developed nations – and at the same time it is taboo to discuss the reasons for, and the cure of, that subfertility which is put forward as the reason for this ‘neccessity’.

    The reason is, in a nutshell, atheism – abandonment of real religion.

    Since the invention of fertility control technologies (including abortion, which is used as such) all secualr societies and groups are seriously subfertile and therefore on course for extinction – partly from the drop in number, partly from the consequent weakness, the increasingly aging population.

    ABout half of native Brits are older than 45 – such societies have never existed in history. By contrast, in some parts of the middle east and africa, more than half the population are children, less than 18. Such societies have never previously existed either! If we count only native Brits, and were to adjudt for the distorted population age structure, the population has been declining probably since the 1970s or 80s, when deaths exceeded births.

    But accurate numbers are impossible because the necessary data is (deliberately) not being collected.

    The dysgenic effect of subfertility are worst (about 1/4 replacement level) among the most intelligent secular women. Extinction is also favoured by accelerated deleterious mutation accumulation with a shrinking population and reduced natural selection (which sometimes leads to ‘mutational meltdown’ and rapid extinction).

    Of course extinction need not be and probably would not be, complete – it just needs to be enough to collapse the system.

    The only groups I know of that are exempt from significant subfertility in developed societies are some of those who live in the most patriarchal and traditional religious groups, among Christians, Muslims and Jews (i.e. ‘monotheists’) who do not use contraception (except for Mormons who do use contraception, and whose average fertility is modestly above replacement, but dropping).

    Liberally or moderately religious and spiritual people are just as subfertile as the atheists.

    I’m not saying that The Answer is to return to traditional religious behaviour; but that at least is a *vital* clue to the cause of the problem.

    • July 23, 2019 at 09:04

      Bruce, sorry but am going to steal this and run it at OoL today, unabridged, attributed of course. It says precisely what I’d hoped to.

    • October 9, 2019 at 05:34

      Thank you so much, Judd! I believe you’re correct. BTW., I recently translated Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi’s infamous book “Praktischer Idealismus” from German to English. You might be interested to read the entire text…it’s now on Kindle & paperback on Amazon.

Comments are closed.