911

With 911 coming up tomorrow, time for a primer on this cult:

He misses certain things because of his Scottish Protestantism but there’s much in there which holds together. The enemy manifests itself in so many ways:

1. Revelations given in dark places like caves;
2. Sun or crescent moon symbolism;
3. Heavy emphasis on ritual, repetition and mass, zombie-like chanting;
4. Enrobed priests with high hats, cowls women in dark robes, often with pillarbox slits;
5. Much phallic symbolism, emphasis on fertility;
6. Homosexuality and paedo part of ritual;
7. Reference to a great architect or one world conflated god;
8. Much violence/torture associated with the cult, e.g. mutilation, rape, murder;
9. Emphasis on ‘passing through fire’;
10. Notion of ranks or degrees, blue orders, the enlightened – always the final stage in blinding light.

911

I saw an argument between someone who hotly demanded that the Muslims did hijack those planes and flew into the buildings and someone who pointed to all the govt collusion, from Silverstein’s admission that they’d probably blow WTC7 later, then his backtracking, not to mention the footage of the CD, not to mention the expert dying some time later when his vehicle ran into a tree to NIST flatly lying in their presser, to the firemen.

And that doesn’t scratch the surface. Quick quiz:

1. Which producer starting with W was in deep do-dos for his sexual proclivities?
2. Which paedo was Andy’s mate?
3. Who were the main lights of the Frankfurt School?
4. Which tribe intermarried with the Assyrians/Babylonians?
5. Which city state had Nimrod and Semiramis?
6. How many Remoaners are lodge members? In the US, what are Shriners?

This can go on and on and my question is – why on earth need the guilty parties not be all of the above? In the post The Missing Children, who were the main culprits? Royalty. What were the Welfs?

I’m suggesting you can’t legitimately argue unless you have a good working knowledge of all these things, because therein lies the truth of what goes on. There’s no either/or, there is deep, ongoing collusion in all these atrocities, far more than almost anyone credits.

One other question – what religious building was constructed near ground zero after 911? Which cult?

As for the Saudis:

https://nypost.com/2019/09/07/robert-mueller-helped-saudi-arabia-cover-up-its-role-in-9-11-attacks-suit/amp/

Statue of Is***r

The photo at OoL tomorrow – who donated the so-called Statue of Liberty to the US of A? Who is this figure portrayed? Fitting that the Great Femin gazes over her handiwork in that manner. Oh, fire motif again.

14 comments for “911

  1. Penseivat
    September 10, 2019 at 16:25

    “Which paedophile was Andy’s mate?”
    Probably being picky, but isn’t the correct term ‘ephebophile’ – someone who is sexually attracted to mid to late adolescents, usually between 15 and 19 years of age?
    Paedophiles are sexually attracted to pre pubescent children.
    Memories of several years on Police child protection teams kicking in, I’m afraid.

    • Lord T
      September 10, 2019 at 17:31

      Sounds a soul destroying job that. Don’t envy you that one.

  2. Lord T
    September 10, 2019 at 17:33

    It was the French if I remember.

    That list looks to me like a good description of the boy scouts, or any age any sex scouts now.

  3. Distant Relative
    September 10, 2019 at 19:41

    The Knights Templar were in the Holy Land beginning in the year 1118. Hughes de Payens, the Master of the Order, although a Christian, was a descendant of Muhammed. It was through this connection that the Templars allied themselves with Islam. The Templars’ principal teachers of alchemy were the enlightened Sufis. The Sufis had gathered the rarest and most valuable alchemical texts of the Egyptians, Persians, and Indians. The Sufi’s also acquired texts from India regarding the mystical form of spiritual enlightenment.

    http://www.midnightfreemasons.org/2019/08/the-33-degrees-of-freemasonry.html

  4. Distant Relative
    September 10, 2019 at 19:50

    Re quiz #2 mate as in fwend would be Epstein. Mate as in sex partner would be Maxwell.
    The world is run by corrupt pervs/billionaires. Might be back later with a couple of vids unrelated to 9/11 but related to interconnected evildoers. Got a garden to water…. 😉

  5. Andy5759
    September 11, 2019 at 01:48

    This sort of post is what I like, there are people who plan to rule us. Who? Why? Would you want all that responsibility? I thought not. So, who? Maybe answer the Why first. Those who crave submission from others, the more the better. Person to person submission can be bought for a dime a dozen for them. To have the world in the palm of your hand must be a bit of a temptation if you are that way inclined. Behind the used and abused are others though. Back to Who again. It’s going to be rather tricky for us to sort this out. When we get to this level can we look towards BJ or DT, even Nigel? They have appeared as if from nowhere to fill a position. A position like TR, now a poisoned stance. Who put them there, allowed them their scripted moment? Where are our revolutionaries? The brave people who stand up for principles and rights, those on the edgy side of politics.

    I must stop now. Rant almost over. Shouting at telly, the Twins should be all over the Nats right now. TF for bread and circuses.

    • September 11, 2019 at 01:49

      “This sort of post is what I like, there are people who plan to rule us.”

      Well yes, Andy, but as one ages, that which we could perhaps perform 4 or 5 times a day, alas one can only achieve now once every few days. 🙂

    • Andy5759
      September 11, 2019 at 03:20

      Twins five zip up at top of ninth. Calm has descended on me, or maybe I have ascended to a state of calm. Corbyn is frit, Bercow is frit. Reasons to be cheerful.

  6. Toodles
    September 11, 2019 at 08:06

    ‘Where are our revolutionaries? The brave people who stand up for principles and rights, those on the edgy side of politics.’

    They are here and places similar, Twitter too. You are one such participant in the fight, along with many others who are researching, commenting, thinking, asking etc.

    Techniques for revolution, or fighting for a cause, a change has shifted through the ages adapting to the times. Always…these times, they are a changing.

    American Indians fought the English in ways the English were not accustomed to fighting….. same with the colonists. Same during the War Between the States. Not knowing much about warfare I am sure you and others can give better examples of how each major, maybe even minor wars adapted to the times

    No doubt the British at one time had no equals in naval power…army too, although the French will disagree about the army. But they fought and used a particular strategy in order to win.

    During WWII there were the brave soldiers on the line. Certain leaders and the underground fighters were doing what they could to beat back the beast. Again, I know I am showing my ignorance, but my point, I hope, is made. We are all participants. Even those who ignore what is going on and prefer delusion do make some kind of impact.

    The enemy is different…or really, is it different? Naming the enemy from without and from within is more of a challenge than the ways wars were once fought. But really the enemy has always been the enemy.

    Again, I wish I could say what I mean to say. I know my ignorance will leave me open for a bit of abuse or correcting…maybe not… and I understand and accept that. As long as my intention is understood I will be glad to be set straight on warfare through the ages.

    Warfare has been going on for eons. Computers and you are part of the technique used in the defensive and offensive strategy of what is a part of our existence.

    • Distant Relative
      September 11, 2019 at 10:21

      +1
      We are an army of Digital Warriors waking ourselves up and in the process sharing what we discover in the hope that some of it at least doesn’t fall on stony ground. 🙂

    • Lord T
      September 11, 2019 at 12:58

      As a nation we are pretty slow at actually standing up and making a point. We talk for ages, we vote, we talk some more, then a couple start doing something, then we talk some more and eventually we start to make a move to fight back. Many are realising now that voting isn’t doing it, many have realised that our government, the police and the media are not on our side. The next stage is a few going out there and doing something.

      Anna Sourface said she was scared of going out at facing the public. She was just making a political point but she is right. The anger will spill over and violence will start. Of course we will all say ‘This is wrong. We should discuss things as civilised people.’ but the reality is that violence, or the genuine threat of violence has resolved more issues over our history than talking from a weak position. Why do you think we are disarmed while the state kills with no penalty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.