Quick look at the US 2020

Tulsi is the most formidable of a poor field and IMHO, would make the least bad of the Dems as Pres.  However, the Dems don’t like her because she has some brains and is not totally corrupt as yet.

All the rest are total tossers – therefore the candidate will come from them.  Fauxahontas appears to be the front runner at this time.

Since then [Wednesday], she’s reneged and has supported him.

8 comments for “Quick look at the US 2020

  1. Distant Relative
    September 11, 2019 at 08:54

    De Blasio and Warren are the ones to watch, in my ‘umble. They’ve shown their willingness to comply with their masters’ wishes.
    http://magaimg.net/img/8csu.jpg

    Them and their acolytes communicate to each other in plain sight in various ways which us normies are not supposed to understand. Weird tweets, for example and colours and modes of dress. http://magaimg.net/img/8csu.jpg I don’t agree with this guy’s conclusion but the rest of it makes one wonder. After Tessie resigned she was seen wearing a similar coloured outfit to those in that link. If BoJo or other so-called Brexiteers start wearing it then we are doomed.

    • September 11, 2019 at 09:23

      Shall look. Same link twice?

      • Distant Relative
        September 11, 2019 at 09:30

        Accidental. Only one intended. Sorry.

  2. Wolfie
    September 11, 2019 at 09:14

    Warren is some surreal level of meat-head. I find it depressing that voters can’t see how corrupt and dishonest she clearly is.

    She makes Trump on his worst days seem brilliant.

    • September 11, 2019 at 09:24

      Designed to dazzle the info-lite.

    • james wilson
      September 12, 2019 at 07:24

      I would have said Warren’s outstanding characteristic is her mediocrity, even in corruption and dissembling, but it may be that mediocrity has appeal to the mediocre.

      • September 12, 2019 at 08:31

        So who will it be then?

        • james wilson
          September 12, 2019 at 18:46

          There is no one who stands out in a positive way, excepting Gabbard, who has no chance (perhaps not mediocre enough?) so after a few primaries it will winnow down to three or four weak candidates, and a brokered convention. Anything goes then.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.