Silly Hal and Sparkle [part ad nauseam]

First the apologetics at the Wail:

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex last night revealed they plan to relaunch their careers – potentially earning millions of pounds a year.

In an astonishing statement on their new website, they complained they had been unable to earn their own money as senior royals. They will give up their income from the Sovereign Grant – the money taxpayers give to the Queen every year – and launch themselves onto the international celebrity circuit.

They will keep Frogmore Cottage in Windsor as they renovated it with their own items and designs.

All right, kudos for giving up public money to earn a living, but keeping taxpayer funded Frogmore, however many ‘items’ of theirs are inside?

Others around the world are weighing in [maybe not a good expression with a female]:

Frankly, this pair is NOT liked, and not just by Brits.

SARAH VINE: What happened to the Prince Harry and Meghan we fell in love with?

You may have, love, some of us were onto her from near the start.  Let me just see if I have this right – Hal and Megs, taxpayer funded, who made their fame from being Royal, quit the royals to make a killing on the Blair-like celeb circuit … for being dissident Royals.

Uh huh.

And to spread their lefty poison worldwide on that circuit.  Got it.  To be fair to the Wail:

While the statement on the couple’s website makes great play of the fact they are giving up the money from the Sovereign Grant, it does not say whether they will be making do without the cash they get from Prince Charles via his private £1.2billion Duchy of Cornwall estate – which some argue should be regarded as a public asset.

Horses backsides, the pair of them.

‘That’s what power looks like’: Fawning celebrities, including Jameela Jamil and Bette Midler, fall over themselves to voice their support for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry after they quit the Royal Family 

How are celeb watchers reacting?  This is from September last:

What’s my personal interest?

We’re not talking just another human, we’re talking one, together with Silly Hal, who heavily influence and have abrogated the non-political stance of Royalty in order to push rabid global leftism of the worst sort, from the climate scam to all the rest of it.

So yes – the political aspect. But there’s sommit else – Brits and Americans. With Brexit, despite Boris [who is American by the way] kowtowing to a class within Europe which detests Britain, detests Boris himself [see EU ‘snidery’], who wants its hands on City money, despite all this, Boris still sucks up to these clowns, while the ‘special alliance is endangered.

It’s quite political – Trump deplorables are generally pro fellow deplorables anywhere, we’re steeped in the wars where we were allies, despite Americans coming over for our wimmin and despite Americans saying listen bud, we came over and saved you and what about the Boston Tea Party, eh? Despite all that, the four white former colonies, plus the US – the English speaking world – are natural allies.

Personally too, I’m quite close to one or two, probably more, Americans, I’ve zero desire to pay any heed to this stupid bickering across the pond, Americans are most welcome here, as are Brits, Antipodaeans, whoever – the Dutch and Germans – what on earth are people’s issues here?

And I feel Sparkle is threatening this. There’s far more of a division between the elite and suck-up celebs and us than any national divisions, I read Spiegel near-daily, in German – what’s the issue? I like Martin Selner of Austria.

The division is far more class/political – there’s a mindset we just won’t stomach, they can’t stomach us, the Sparkle couple are of the other side.

Social media in full cry

7 comments for “Silly Hal and Sparkle [part ad nauseam]

  1. The Underdoug
    January 9, 2020 at 11:47

    “The Firm simply cannot allow this.”

    Is this implying an upcoming Pont de l’Almacide?

  2. Distant Relative
    January 9, 2020 at 12:01

    Rumours currently circulating about these two. Take your pick 😀

    It was a contract marriage because RF were worried that he was taking too long to settle down. And/or she’s his beard cos he has a longterm boyfriend, he’s a closet gay, or he’s bi.

    She’s backed by anti-royal “philanthropists” to bring down the RF. Burkle being mooted and the So Ho Ho connection. Or even Georg SoreArse

    She has dirt on various members of the RF.

    They’ve never lived in Frogwarts – residents living nearby claim no security, no lights, no delivery etc.

    They haven’t lived together ever. Video by Haz and another ginge for some money-making scam was taken at Eugenie’s gaff at KP not Frogwarts seems to be where that stems from.

    M Anderson is her handler and the father of Archie cos Haz is sterile.

    Archie born “not of the body” i.e. she used a surrogate hence no title for Archificial, because she is in fact transgender male to female and conned Haz and the RF but has now been caught out and given the order of the boot.

    She was a CIA assassin placed in the RF to assassinate Trump when he visited.

    This latest spectacle is a front for their impending D I V O R C E and is the reason behind Sweaty-Armpit-Gate at Canada House the other day.

    This was all arranged by HM as the ultimate birthday gift to Catherine. <(My particular fave 🙂 )

    ALL Allegedly.

    Got to admire the creative minds out there.

    Whatever. Murky Meg is finished and will be off to pick up an ageing yacht-owning billionaire next. Haz will be welcomed back into the bosom of his family eventually. Just another hiccough in the annals of QE2.

  3. Mark
    January 9, 2020 at 13:42

    Duck dynasty here we come.

    Fuck me that didn’t take long!

    So I suppose we’ll see a fawning “lives of” shitshow made by some “woke” partner in crime followed by a messy divorce.

    Then we’ll see what this “lady” has renounced.

    Jeez, missed a trick. Should have nomination the ginger halfwit for EU commissioner when we had the chance!

  4. January 9, 2020 at 15:11

    Is it all just a storm in a bone china teacup, with accompanying third world avocados on toast:

  5. Mudplugger
    January 9, 2020 at 15:38

    Anyone who recalls watching ‘My Fair Lady’ on TV over Christmas may be struck by the prescient accuracy of Lerner’s lyrics in ‘I’m An Ordinary Man’ – “. . . . . .but let a woman in your life . . . . .”
    I think we can all see Harry’s problem through Professor Higgins’ eyes.

  6. ivan
    January 9, 2020 at 20:02

    James Delingpole has an excellent take down on Breitbart

    • January 9, 2020 at 20:49

      I’ve so many screenshots on it to go but am all HalMegged out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.