One can’t do everything and admittedly, I’m lagging behind everyone else on this story, I just don’t know, so let me present these two [you may have already had all your serious discussions about it all]:

From Leggy’s article:

My first thought on reading that was ‘Huh?’ Every other respiratory virus and bacterium does this. Why would they ever think this one wouldn’t? Of course it bloody does.

It’s why I thought the drivers on those buses were taking a great risk and why I was astounded that the case-on-a-plane prompted them to only look for the nearby-seated passengers. Of course it spreads in aerosols. Why wouldn’t it? And even if it was later found not to, why would you not assume that it could (since pretty much everything else does) and take appropriate precautions?

It’s not so much the virus that’s dangerous here, it’s the slapdash approach to it and the ridiculous coverups to quell public fears. Look, you need to be afraid of it, you need to avoid it or it becomes endemic.

However, this isn’t meant to be a scare story even though that’s pretty much what I do.

It will spread through aerosols, yes. Someone who shows no symptoms and who has no idea they are infected could spread it all over an auditorium. However…

It’s an RNA virus. Not a retrovirus like HIV. It doesn’t convert its RNA into DNA and hide in your cells for decades before emerging with an ‘Ah-ha! Gotcha!’. Its genetic code is RNA which is not as stable as DNA. It’s very susceptible to drying out and to UV light in particular. It’s also killed by bleach but then so is everything else, including you. So don’t try bleaching yourself.

I’m quite sure that was a piece of sane writing and he probably has it right. However, that does not alter this next one, sensationalist as the Indians can often be, yet maybe this is what Them are trying to do or at least those freelancing and being paid by them or whichever configuration of bastardry it is. You need to get past the sensationalism and get to the things which can be substantiated:

On June 13, 2012 a 60-year-old Saudi man was admitted to a private hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, with a 7-day history of fever, cough, expectoration, and shortness of breath. He had no history of cardiopulmonary or renal disease, was receiving no long-term medications, and did not smoke.

Egyptian virologist Dr. Ali Mohamed Zaki isolated and identified a previously unknown coronavirus from his lungs. After routine diagnostics failed to identify the causative agent, Zaki contacted Ron Fouchier, a leading virologist at the Erasmus Medical Center (EMC) in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, for advice.

This Coronavirus sample was acquired by Scientific Director Dr. Frank Plummer (key to Coronavirus investigation Frank Plummer was recently assassinated in Africa) of Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg directly from Fouchier, who received it from Zaki. This virus was reportedly stolen from the Canadian lab by Chinese agents.

Food for thought eh?

2 comments for “Corona-origin?

  1. Distant Relative
    February 11, 2020 at 08:12

    Because of this according to some news report last week France is now on a Yellow Alert.

    So wonderfully un-PC the French.

    As for ‘t virus…. whatever.

  2. dearieme
    February 11, 2020 at 12:06

    The origin matters not a button.

    A chap I follow is this fellow.

    He makes no claims to expertise in virology or epidemiology. He just speculates on what might have been going on in China and conjectures what the consequences for the rest of us might be.

    He may be quite wrong – it may all peter out quite soon. I suspect that’s not the way to bet, in the sense that it may be sensible to take a few precautions in your own life.

Comments are closed.