Anna Racoon says, at Jailhouse Lawyer:
Prisoners incontrovertibly have an interest in who precisely is making the legislation that governs their stay at Her Majesty’s Pleasure, and I see no merit in the argument that part of their punishment should be further removing them from engagement in civic society.
No legislation without representation may well be their motto. That prisoners might not be best disposed towards the government responsible for the laws which currently see them incarcerated may account for the strange reluctance of this ‘Equality for all’ Government to implement the ECtHR recommendations.
I’m putting up a poll in the sidebar about it. This blog doesn’t have a huge success rate with polls but we’ll give it a go.
Can it be said that no two people will agree on whisky?
Appealing to women is an interesting dilemma. On the one hand, the overt masculinity of the advertising and culture of whisky can alienate female drinkers, but creating brands specifically for women is not generally seen as the answer.
Paul Godfrey is the group marketing manager, malt whisky portfolio global at William Grant & Sons. He says:
“Ironically, women like whisky because it’s masculine. Some of the brands failing have tried to appeal to women with a different product. For a lot of women the product is acceptable and the masculinity is an area of appeal; it is part of the approbation of male rituals. A year ago we were working toward a feminine whisky, but after research we decided it was a terrible idea. Women don’t want girls’ versions of the drink.”
Read more →
Writing to his father from Paris (1778), Mozart described his fruitless attempts to teach composition to the Duc de Guines’ daughter (intriguingly, Mozart considered teaching music a “science”). His father suggested he persist patiently, adding, “. . . should Monsieur le Duc hear some little thing composed by his daughter, he will be beside himself with pleasure”.
Read more →
Do you ever travel by plane? Then this might be of interest:
On the Heathrow crash:
Peter Burkill praised his first officer John Coward after he glided a packed Boeing 777 on to the end of one of the airport’s runways following a power failure as it came in to land. Coward fought with controls and cleared the airport perimeter fence by just 7ft – narrowly missing homes, a school and a petrol station as the plane fell without power at more than 100mph.
“Peter has been the victim of a whispering campaign. They were saying he chickened out. That was rubbish – he handled it brilliantly”.
There was considerable discussion:
Read more →
There are plenty of negatives I’ve heard about BT and BT Broadband but this story is a bit different.
I lost all internet connection an hour and a half ago. Once I saw that it did not seem to be Firefox or Safari, the next thought was Google, as their services have been quite sluggish, especially trying to revamp my reader, deleting and adding links. However, it did seem to be internet connection and I dread calling BT.
I did find a number [wrong one] but it didn’t matter and for once their cursed Press 1 if you want, Press 2 if you want – it actually worked and after the usual inane “we are recording everything you’re doing so as to improve our service to you”, a gross insult to intelligence if ever there was one, I got to a representative within a few minutes.
From that moment on, it was Rolls Royce service. He took me through everything, checked this, checked that, checked account, connections etc. and all with a rep actually there. We switched off, then back on in 2 minutes, adjusted the hub, did this and that and slowly it came back. All the while, the problem was being diagnosed.
Then I was registered by them into various BT accounts and so on. I asked to speak with the man’s supervisor and was patched through. He must have been shocked that someone wanted to heap praise on BT but it was deserved in this instance.
Here are various snippets from around the traps.
Topics eligible for debate in David Cameron’s parliament:
David Cameron today just unveiled plans to ensure that any petition of 100,000 people would be eligible for debate in Parliament. Any petition with 1 million signatures would result in a bill being tabled in Parliament.
Sounds like innovative, direct democracy.
But what if the public back issues that are either distinctly un-Cameroonian or potentially divisive for a Tory government?
Read more →