Meanwhile, in America

familysmall

Land of the infringed constitutional rights.  It’s quite significant that SCOTUS have come down on the side of the constitution but I suspect they’ve come down on the chance to hit the state legislatures:

The Supreme Court says it will take up a challenge to Chicago’s ban on handguns, opening the way for a ruling that could set off a vigorous new campaign to roll back state and local gun controls across the nation.

Victory for gun-rights proponents in the Chicago case is considered likely, even by supporters of gun control, in the latest battle in the nation’s long and often bitter dispute over the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. A ruling against the city’s outright ban could lead to legal challenges to less-restrictive laws across the country that limit who can own guns, whether firearms must be registered and how they should be stored.

The case is to be argued early next year.

Last year, the justices struck down a prohibition on handguns in the District of Columbia, a city with unique federal status, as a violation of the Second Amendment. Now the court will decide whether that ruling should apply to local and state laws as well.

There’s every indication over there that the common man and woman aren’t buying any of this constitutional contraction c–p.  Them appears to have a little problem on its hands, which is why it’s going to need FEMA to help with “insurgents”.

Insurgent – Merriam-Webster:

1 : a person who revolts against civil authority or an established government; especially : a rebel not recognized as a belligerent
2 : one who acts contrary to the policies and decisions of one’s own political party

Pause the video at 0:49 and look at the FBI document. Then pause again at 0:57. Thre is a reference there, which you can see for yourself, that on a list of suspected insurgents is anyone who “makes numerous references to the U.S. Constitution”, and “should be monitored as potentially murderous and fanatical terrorists”.

Hmmmmm. Look at this one – a FEMA induction course. As of last evening, this youtube failed to work. Maybe it will now:

The leader jokes with inductees about the Founding Fathers also being terrorists.

Does this buggy you as much as it does me?

Baby-Buggy-Eith-En1888-ApprovedCourtesy of Angus – remember the name Ian Shaw, folks, Bournemouth Borough Council’s housing manager.

When council officers stole* a baby buggy and after the couple reported the theft to the council, said council wanted £50 for them to get it back.

Said our Ian:

“The health and safety of our residents is our number one priority. It is our responsibility to ensure fire escape routes are clear and the importance is evident when you read the tragic story of the tower block fire that killed six people in Camberwell in July.”

* stole …  One of Merriam-Webster’s definitions is:

to take surreptitiously or without permission

Another says:

without intent to return it

The council may have warned residents not to block the entrance.  We have no way of knowing if the buggy was sticking out or was in the corner or what.  What is known is that the buggy was removed, with no notice and not just removed to a sideroom but was impounded, occasioning a large fine.

I think they might have been within their rights to move it to a side room and to leave a notice saying what they’d done and where to get the buggy back.  Then the discussion could have taken place and the rule made clear.

But what Ian *&$%^£ing Shaw is trying to put over is more than Jobsworth – it is officious.

Just when you’re tired

71What is it?

Meanwhile:

A ship is docked in the harbour. Over the side hangs a rope ladder with rungs a foot apart. The tide rises at a rate of 9 inches per hour. At the end of six hours, how much of the rope ladder will still remain above water, assuming that 9 feet were above the water when the tide began to rise?

Just how many incidents need there be?

fema - New Orleans

Here is a pdf with the names and the official organizations of people, until 2009, who are or were members of either the CFR, Trilateral Commission or Bilderberg Society.

Here is a Scrb read, tracing the dominance of members of these groups in the corridors of power, from congress through to education.  for example:

originsThere is no logical reason why this would not be so.  Groups of likeminded people across the world have a world view which is globalist in concept – one world currency, central bank control of the money market, rich enough to bail banks out and thence to own those they bailed out, powerful enough to “advise” governments, e.g. the SPPNA and committed to continual unrest and military conflict to keep the machine running and to create crises in order to profit from them.

The ones who lose out in this are those with homes and mortgages, jobs and who are young enough to go off to war in pursuit of a nationalism that those who caused these wars patently do not believe in themselves.  This is cross-party, cross-social class, cross-religious divide – these people will lie down with anyone.

I have given the url of the pdf of the CFR in a few posts and some of that group have commented at my site that a few nuts in a thinktank present a report – so what?  It’s a thinktank, for goodness sake.

Not so.

This thinktank was powerful enough to cause Martin, Fox and Bush to meet and discuss the matter on March 23rd, 2005.  Their website claimed there were no agreements signed.  That’s like Clinton claiming he might have had a joint in his hand but he didn’t inhale.

Ditto with FEMA.  Kenney stated in the Rather interview:

“We’re currently one of the first teams that was deployed to support the city of New York for this disaster. We arrived on late Monday night, and went into action on Tuesday morning. And not until today did we get a full opportunity to work the entire site.”

That was stated on the audio and a Real Audio recording of it was available here but if you click on the link, it’s been taken down.  On top of that, everyone including WND thought he must have been confused until Giuliani came out during the May 18-19, 2004 hearings and said:

… the reason Pier 92 was selected as a command center was because on the next day, on September 12, Pier 92 was going to have a drill, it had hundreds of people here, from FEMA, from the Federal Government, from the State, from the State Emergency Management Office, and they were getting ready for a drill for biochemical attack. So that was gonna be the place they were going to have the drill. The equipment was already there, so we were able to establish a command center there …

Right, so FEMA claimed they weren’t there on the 10th.  If you discount Kenney [and on what basis would you do that?] and accept that FEMA, on Giuliani’s say so, were in place already but accepting their statement that they had no one there on the 10th, then they must have had on the 11th.  Yet FEMA never mention that and if you go to the 911 Commission transcripts, guess which is the only one missing?

Right – Giuliani’s.

If FEMA were running an exercise, then this was not known by anyone on the 10th or prior to it, no officers were on standby or deployed, no equipment had even been moved into proximity, ready to be taken into the city.  No one in America knew the least thing about any exercise.

Suddenly, on the 11th, everyone knew about it in FEMA and resources were deployed on an “exercise” from all over the States.

Yeah, right.

Moving on – FEMA’s actions re Katrina were amazingly inept for a supposed save-people’s-lives-and-property organization.  Omission, delays, breakdowns in communication [which search and rescue services don’t seem to suffer from] and politicking got in the way.

If I were to suggest that saving people was not FEMA’s prime directive in the least, I’d be shot down in flames.

Then we come to the Pittsburgh and Washington black-armoured troops advancing on and beating students.  It wasn’t quelling the protests which was the real issue – it was the manner of it.

So we’re caught in a continuing series of events where things are as plain as day, the internet reports on it, including perfectly rational blogs with large followings, the thing is denied and the internet mocked, as if it was one homogenous unit and it all dies down, only to be brought up again at the next step in the process.

Salami tactics do work and meanwhile, the people sleep, except for the tea-parties.