It’s patently obvious what they’re trying to do:


It was only a matter of time before James Bond became a gay black woman.

Since Daniel Craig announced he was standing down as James Bond, debate has raged whether the next 007 should be a woman, or black.

Now The Mail on Sunday can reveal that she will be both – thanks to the intervention of feminist TV writer Phoebe Waller-Bridge.

In what’s been called a ‘popcorn-dropping moment’, British star Lashana Lynch, will be given Bond’s licence to kill in the 25th movie in the franchise, currently being shot in Italy and the UK.

They’re just teasing it now with replacing the number. But they’re obviously hoping they can get away with making the actual substitution.

It’s unusual iconoclasm in that the destroyer is the one who set up the original construct anyway but has changed its mind, i.e. TUA.


I was asked about Trump’s comments on ‘the squad’ of four – what’s to say? He’s right, they need deporting or executing, whichever is legal.


6 comments for “Iconoclasm

  1. James Strong
    July 16, 2019 at 06:57

    Bond is a very successful seducer.
    If the new Bond is a gay woman can we expect lots of girl-on-girl action?

    If so, could Bond XXV replace the legendary ‘Lesbian Spank Inferno’ in the Best Film lists of certain connoisseurs?

    • July 16, 2019 at 07:26

      We could probably close off the Bond series as a continuum at 24. Also, I’d say Doctor Who ended with Series 8 – Matt Smith and Jenna Coleman. Everything after that was jumping the shark.

  2. Marin in Mayenne
    July 16, 2019 at 07:33

    Trump was perfectly right, in the same way that if an ex director of a failed company tried to sell me management consultancy, I’d tell them to f off and come back when they’d got it right.

    I don’t see that it was racist either, unless to criticise a black person is automatically racist. He did refer to them as congresswomen though, perhaps he should be accused of sexism?

    • James Strong
      July 16, 2019 at 13:17

      It’s not racist at all. He was responding to their statements and policy ambitions.

      ‘People of colour’ deserve to have their ideas scrutinised just like everybody else. Being ‘of colour’ does not give immunity.

      I think Diane Abbott is a very poor politician. That is not racist.

      Were I to think that Diane Abbott is a very poor politician because she is black that would be racist, and it’s not what I think.

      I think Trump is a terrific President, and that is not based on his skin colour.

  3. July 16, 2019 at 14:08

    The lovely and talented Chrysalis wrote to remind us men that three of those four squaddies were born in the U.S., if of foreign stock.

    Gosh, you know, we never thought of that, our research skills don’t extend that far.

    The Donald just added this:

    The Democrat Congresswomen have been spewing some of the most vile, hateful, and disgusting things ever said by a politician in the House or Senate, & yet they get a free pass and a big embrace from the Democrat Party. Horrible anti-Israel, anti-USA, pro-terrorist & public…..

    …..shouting of the F…word, among many other terrible things, and the petrified Dems run for the hills. Why isn’t the House voting to rebuke the filthy and hate laced things they have said? Because they are the Radical Left, and the Democrats are afraid to take them on. Sad!

    As has been noted across social media today – clever move, forcing lowlifes Schumer and Pelosi to either support their radical left agenda, or else split from them.

    The question of deporting is hardly the issue, is it?

  4. July 16, 2019 at 14:41

    “”……three of those four squaddies were born in the U.S., if of foreign stock…..””

    Judas was a Judean too.

Comments are closed.